Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Tue, 30 January 2018 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0D512711B; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:02:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6F6FYZ4wfRuC; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:02:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33E2812EB47; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:02:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id y80so10720793qkb.4; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:02:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tqQp50y5X4vd8aor4jw+w6gtPkTY7z1AD07Pwb9eA3c=; b=qG3g0MuQUOqvdMLFpUnlIox0ByZDLNcqv1kz8clOyyPy87NDj6hm7b1/3bm66OcGJO TJJcbNFe+Fnz2ALkLOQG4ukIEgq1XOtY68fnfKRtBglyq0EaXQ5xGoN0AaZbImyo21g1 4tI1K+snfHADNlEfspxRAPgWWo9cRuav4no3MI6GxhjaXZD366a/LGPrQyQdztY2Nrfr 3P+UR8ApachZMY1MT7uUz4Qp8ZibWNITT/KPwuKMQZJGctoV05nKyOjyemw4HPNb8vno sn/bc7I6mWcVR/vdGvzPeLxv6gbGTY54YfEj9nhxXpCTGeTRVkzIkaVc9eJ5WuQ/ggXx 6kKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tqQp50y5X4vd8aor4jw+w6gtPkTY7z1AD07Pwb9eA3c=; b=jTayLeCHqKMSayMQmGz0rDCs38DmiePZVJ7djCc+Rc1ycPAisMCVrEy38AOt/xXO8a PBPZKsjqO4n5OOBel5Xaow4yEgVK/jWcKANr2i8j/obKufetP3N2jZBBeO7+8qxLvukr xxy4QCPcSzs+Bh1XIfIM/Q4raUmeoAqa2uhsT7yoYgzR8iRf3isOjxT7KytJbrT8Uo6K LdMSCqE4KnZu+Vi+sISdcu99ReZ/5CLHw59P55d9pnzT4jVt8jMHJTb7Nisq/NT3KboS heW7wHsFSEDBtwuBT7h5KY+P4TKEyN8+ylQE0dwEcLr5nz2DC6x7beYJ2fJDLEC22n6P M8iQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcG6m05twoIhFnyOXQDISJapwyiyWDMuid3EDlzlz7UgQQDCReU vIuYyPZCTctYshUGqWqgfQaP8rxqVwTfIuW77Bc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225g2nHSHNUS3HPhJagqZj8odyph9Qlm6jzZdsgNiPNbSPzJlCBbAWKVrjPqDDqpCR1qSwral9zMjgMSAoFmwZw=
X-Received: by 10.55.97.2 with SMTP id v2mr39870208qkb.266.1517328165273; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:02:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.23.147 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:02:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <055F4469-EC52-4B7B-B661-661647FF222B@cooperw.in>
References: <151681599994.22697.16969006332176223005@ietfa.amsl.com> <EA611862-03E6-4E6E-8221-20EC57E47D98@qti.qualcomm.com> <055F4469-EC52-4B7B-B661-661647FF222B@cooperw.in>
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 18:02:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4UQ+TDWuWYP03GfOwaJgGc1nyy0BwmS+Q4+GtSKtmO+CQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org, gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0575004c85b70564007eed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/0zqfbcFn_lIzAJiJuI7exC64Djc>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:02:54 -0000

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:

>
> > On Jan 29, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> 8. Section 4:
> >>
> >> 'It is anticipated that
> >>   those roles will evolve.  The IASA is responsible for keeping the
> >>   community informed in this regard, and MAY do so without updating
> >>   this memo.'
> >>
> >> I would be a little concerned if some of the key roles would change
> without
> >> this document being updated. I understand the need to be flexible, but
> we need
> >> to put some limits. Maybe at least emphasize the need to inform the
> community
> >> by a MUST. For example:
> >>
> >> 'It is anticipated that
> >>   those roles will evolve.  The IASA MUST keep the
> >>   community informed in this regard, and MAY do so without updating
> >>   this memo.'
> >
> > I don't think the MUST significantly changes the meaning, so I'm
> ambivalent about the change. Since this text was put in to address a
> comment in AD Evaluation, I'm inclined to hear from Alissa.
>
> Perhaps the concern could be addressed by saying “without first updating
> this memo”? The point I raised is that this document shouldn’t gate the
> ability for the roles to change, but certainly if they do change the
> document should be updated (or obsoleted by a new document) to match the
> reality.
>
> Thanks,
> Alissa



That would be fine with me.

Regards,

Dan