Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 01 February 2018 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12C8126BF6; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:12:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eR27kO-SyvKw; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:12:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63ACC12D889; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:12:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3443; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1517505141; x=1518714741; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=k7d96bDcOkizuB2ROpYOLMH6/d6BrLXv25r3YcnbMZg=; b=G2QSVAFM2hfBq1nb2MNTbBf/Ba1Sf16PJlibHcDTEsgjU2ab5RNoP5Li mLqpEKhMGvLEdGM9zin18Mj39e9bJDNlufQl9lJlmYbYPS5X3Or6SCzWK XaI0uCG6lMi7lfiEJXLrZGzLI//8v4dfbjHJWFNyqO5jza/SUQ7JJYFNd 8=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DEAQCOSXNa/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYUdhAiLGI8TJ5lfBwOFOwIagm8UAQEBAQEBAQECayiFJAEFI1YQCQIOCioCAgJVBgEMCAEBijGNT51xgieKZQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEQD4RphVQpDIJ5hHs+gwCCZQWaHIoHhGKCMo5ajDKHf5drgTw2IoFQMxoIGxWCaIMJgW5AijWCSwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.46,444,1511827200"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="1745841"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2018 17:12:18 +0000
Received: from [10.61.243.57] ([10.61.243.57]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w11HCHct002395; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 17:12:18 GMT
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, mtgvenue@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process.all@ietf.org
References: <151681599994.22697.16969006332176223005@ietfa.amsl.com> <EA611862-03E6-4E6E-8221-20EC57E47D98@qti.qualcomm.com> <8316bd79-56b8-a3e5-a481-b977f97351cd@cisco.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <a13e9c2f-3285-ac96-babd-b01bc1b05c7c@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 18:12:15 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8316bd79-56b8-a3e5-a481-b977f97351cd@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qKhoEXIW2411DvhlfV6k6gl6DfHj3o4nt"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/hDu41GyXbPm2KC2PX5Noa7zVpDg>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:12:23 -0000

I wrote:


On 29.01.18 23:07, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> The line in question is as follows:
>
>       This includes,
>       but is not limited to, native and unmodified IPv4 and IPv6
>       connectivity, global reachability, and no additional limitation
>       that would materially impact their Internet use.
>
> How about:
>
> This includes,
>       but is not limited to, native and unmodified IPv4 and IPv6
>       connectivity, global reachability, and no additional limitation
>       that would materially impact their Internet use.

And what I meant to propose was this:

        It MUST be possible to provision
         Internet Access to the Facility and IETF Hotels that allows
         local attendees to utilize the Internet for all their IETF,
         business, and day to day needs; as well as sufficient
         bandwidth and access for remote attendees. This includes, but
is not
         limited to, native and unmodified IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity,
         global reachability, and no  additional limitation that would
         materially impact their Internet use.
 

Sorry for the confusion.