Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-01

Julien ÉLIE <julien@trigofacile.com> Thu, 08 December 2016 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <julien@trigofacile.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58741296BA for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:04:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P0GnBaGe2n_Y for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:04:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp10.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E800E129587 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:04:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from macbook-pro-de-julien-elie.home ([92.170.5.52]) by mwinf5d86 with ME id HZ441u00217Lgi403Z44Qu; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 22:04:10 +0100
X-ME-Helo: macbook-pro-de-julien-elie.home
X-ME-Auth: anVsaWVuLmVsaWU0ODdAd2FuYWRvby5mcg==
X-ME-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 22:04:10 +0100
X-ME-IP: 92.170.5.52
To: "jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
References: <148090444981.5523.17374875997079514429.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <337ddd16-232b-6fee-d910-eb3d35a0e874@trigofacile.com> <2A345AB1-1064-4546-87B1-F54F8EEB2EB1@gmail.com>
From: Julien ÉLIE <julien@trigofacile.com>
Organization: TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
Message-ID: <fe4bdabf-19d0-889d-3554-50ad27b905a9@trigofacile.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 22:04:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2A345AB1-1064-4546-87B1-F54F8EEB2EB1@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/16GIeTLnQrKuRSASeubUdLSHcDg>
Cc: draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations.all@ietf.org, "General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 21:04:17 -0000

Hi Jouni,

> What you propose below is what I was thinking about. So yes, OK with that.

OK, thanks.  Now integrated in the future revised I-D.

-- 
Julien


>> On Dec 7, 2016, at 1:19 PM, Julien ÉLIE <julien@trigofacile.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jouni,
>>
>> First of all, thanks for having taken time to review the document.
>>
>>
>>> I think this document is ready for publication.
>>>
>>> I have comment, which is just a suggestion concerning document
>>> structure. Currently the updates/changes to RFC4642 are listed in
>>> Introduction. On the other hand there is a specific section for
>>> recommendations. I would move the updates/changes to RFC4642 into its
>>> own section just to make the document a bit more structured.
>>
>> Is it OK if I move from Section 1 "Introduction", the part "Notably, this document updates [RFC4642]... of [RFC7525] instead." to a new Section 2 "Updates/Changes to RFC 4642"?
>> I'll then drop "Notably" in the pasted wording, and mention that detailed changes are listed in Appendix A of the document.
>> The "Recommendations" Section becomes Section 3, and so on.
>>
>> Or did you have something else in mind?
>>
>> Thanks again,
>>
>> --
>> Julien ÉLIE