Re: [Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01

[Wassim Haddad <[e-mail]>]

I think it does. Thanks a lot!


Cheers,

Wassim H.





On May 10, 2011, at 7:40 PM, Terry Manderson wrote:

> The justification for using SHOULD has been included in the -03 draft of the
> document. (diff attached)
> 
> The other minor issue in wording "it should use" was fixed in an earlier
> version.
> 
> Does this clear up your concerns?
> 
> Cheers
> Terry
> 
> On 17/03/11 7:20 AM, "Wassim Haddad" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> Sorry for re-sending 3 times...
>> 
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: Wassim Haddad <[e-mail]>
>>> Date: March 16, 2011 2:16:57 PM PDT
>>> To: Gen-art <[e-mail]>
>>> Cc: Wassim Haddad <[e-mail]>,
>>> "[e-mail]"
>>> <[e-mail]>
>>> Subject: [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
>>> 
>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects. For
>>> background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>> 
>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments
>>> you may receive.
>>> 
>>> Document: draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
>>> Title: RPKI Objects Issued by IANA
>>> Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad
>>> Review Date: 16-March-2011
>>> IETF LC End Date: 11-March-2011
>>> IESG Telechat date: 17-March 2011
>>> 
>>> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but it
>>> would be helpful for the reader to clarify one item
>>> 
>>> - Major issue: none
>>> - Minor issue: in the abstract, the draft says that "it provides specific
>>> directions to IANA" then it ends with: "it should use".
>>> The reader might be confused as to what "specific" vs "should" can mean in
>>> this context.
>>> 
>>> idem for s as to why there is a SHOULD again in page 7 (section 5: Reserved
>>> Resources): it mentions "SHOULD" issue an AS0 ROA.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Wassim H.
>> 
> 
> <draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-03-from-2.diff.html>