[Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01

Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com> Wed, 16 March 2011 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B09D3A6A24 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OiwtDyHbs+ql for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr3.ericy.com (imr3.ericy.com [198.24.6.13]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368A43A694C for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) by imr3.ericy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2GLIOHg021156 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:18:48 -0500
Received: from wassim-haddad.dyn.sj.us.am.ericsson.se (147.117.20.213) by eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se (147.117.20.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.234.1; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:18:46 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
From: Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:18:45 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <F513619B-DA6E-4731-A06D-45E985BC9583@ericsson.com>
References: <B669D355-3021-44E5-9C4A-BD7359746645@ericsson.com>
To: Gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>, draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects.all@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:17:23 -0000

> From: Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>
> Date: March 16, 2011 2:16:57 PM PDT
> To: Gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>
> Cc: Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects@ietf.org>
> Subject: [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects. For 
> background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments 
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
> Title: RPKI Objects Issued by IANA
> Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad
> Review Date: 16-March-2011
> IETF LC End Date: 11-March-2011
> IESG Telechat date: 17-March 2011
> 
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but it would be helpful for the reader to clarify one item
> 
> - Major issue: none
> - Minor issue: in the abstract, the draft says that "it provides specific directions to IANA" then it ends with: "it should use". 
> The reader might be confused as to what "specific" vs "should" can mean in this context.
> 
> idem for s as to why there is a SHOULD again in page 7 (section 5: Reserved Resources): it mentions "SHOULD" issue an AS0 ROA.  
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Wassim H.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>