[Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01

Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com> Wed, 16 March 2011 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB61A3A6A24 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VN1K2CyMcVFU for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.8]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCAF3A694C for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p2GLH05D020050; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:17:03 -0500
Received: from wassim-haddad.dyn.sj.us.am.ericsson.se (147.117.20.213) by eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se (147.117.20.92) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.234.1; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:16:57 -0400
From: Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:16:57 -0700
Message-ID: <B669D355-3021-44E5-9C4A-BD7359746645@ericsson.com>
To: Gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>, draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:15:37 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects. For 
background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments 
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
Title: RPKI Objects Issued by IANA
Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad
Review Date: 16-March-2011
IETF LC End Date: 11-March-2011
IESG Telechat date: 17-March 2011

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but it would be helpful for the reader to clarify one item

- Major issue: none
- Minor issue: in the abstract, the draft says that "it provides specific directions to IANA" then it ends with: "it should use". 
The reader might be confused as to what "specific" vs "should" can mean in this context.

idem for s as to why there is a SHOULD again in page 7 (section 5: Reserved Resources): it mentions "SHOULD" issue an AS0 ROA.  


Regards,

Wassim H.