Re: [Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> Wed, 11 May 2011 02:40 UTC
Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82E5E06DB; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hj3eAZ8EDwUx; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6D0E06A6; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:40:32 -0700
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>, Gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:40:27 -0700
Thread-Topic: [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
Thread-Index: AcvkICNnabxn1o/gShObTMKuevK1qQrZKWlv
Message-ID: <C9F0343C.128CB%terry.manderson@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <067958B7-CC43-46E1-A376-EA13BBFC3C77@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_C9F0343C128CBterrymandersonicannorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:30:53 -0700
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects.all@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 02:40:37 -0000
The justification for using SHOULD has been included in the -03 draft of the document. (diff attached) The other minor issue in wording "it should use" was fixed in an earlier version. Does this clear up your concerns? Cheers Terry On 17/03/11 7:20 AM, "Wassim Haddad" <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com> wrote: > Sorry for re-sending 3 times... > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com> >> Date: March 16, 2011 2:16:57 PM PDT >> To: Gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org> >> Cc: Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>, >> "draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects@ietf.org" >> <draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects@ietf.org> >> Subject: [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01 >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects. For >> background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments >> you may receive. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01 >> Title: RPKI Objects Issued by IANA >> Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad >> Review Date: 16-March-2011 >> IETF LC End Date: 11-March-2011 >> IESG Telechat date: 17-March 2011 >> >> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but it >> would be helpful for the reader to clarify one item >> >> - Major issue: none >> - Minor issue: in the abstract, the draft says that "it provides specific >> directions to IANA" then it ends with: "it should use". >> The reader might be confused as to what "specific" vs "should" can mean in >> this context. >> >> idem for s as to why there is a SHOULD again in page 7 (section 5: Reserved >> Resources): it mentions "SHOULD" issue an AS0 ROA. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Wassim H. >
- [Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana… Wassim Haddad
- [Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana… Wassim Haddad
- [Gen-art] Fwd: [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr… Wassim Haddad
- Re: [Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-… Terry Manderson
- Re: [Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-… Wassim Haddad