IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00

Mike Shand <imc.shand@gmail.com> Wed, 18 December 2013 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <imc.shand@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0131AE3D3 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 06:25:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id njCTeFegKerd for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 06:25:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3421AE1A6 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 06:25:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q59so7655754wes.27 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 06:25:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lkvqwwiDUZXyIXIzZKtE/hlOkX0c9Aaux9nRulNzmuQ=; b=Mdy+UwtyEyDbxLYYq4rZhF0mDmcaKspCMgvU7fleIgPNpQ1SfgXQmdgnxdJ9KNDx2l YrFN6jwYHi+DOCWfOSfziiD4U69P1ChXFUU0VgeJYYVAlTte11FRQ3KQuMU2Nqt/yBbO V/Ku9quDIn638ASaeqmFwIEnptSHhSPsFaan5pWseOngoHpflLYgOWsFaHG0fOUoFlp5 ErAvAZP6+jjt/NUr9x2Y4lu7nzR0fORLO4jtYYjUb+NdeQz2RHUXsTX44B+6KEae6Gln v0YrJJFpOFI6Su8cKaCNVzOncL2WuxODMr6SFQb15gXyYaJBU+b1JOPSrk97L1EaJhqC ChFw==
X-Received: by 10.180.84.166 with SMTP id a6mr8248676wiz.49.1387376706138; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 06:25:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.183] (46-65-61-13.zone16.bethere.co.uk. [46.65.61.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fu1sm1413222wib.9.2013.12.18.06.25.04 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 06:25:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52B1B033.6070507@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:24:51 +0000
From: Mike Shand <imc.shand@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA129F13C6@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <F3ADE4747C9E124B89F0ED2180CC814F23BDB1CE@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F3ADE4747C9E124B89F0ED2180CC814F23BDB1CE@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 06:27:06 -0800
Cc: "draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:25:10 -0000

I agree.

     Mike

On 17/12/2013 14:52, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
> Dan -
>
> Thanx for the review.
> I have no objection to your suggestion. I would hope this change can be done by the RFC Editor.
>
>     Les
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:35 AM
>> To: gen-art@ietf.org
>> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org
>> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
>>
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
>> please see the FAQ at
>>
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
>> receive.
>>
>> Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review Date: 12/17/13
>> IETF LC End Date: 12/24/13
>> IESG Telechat date:
>>
>> Summary: Ready
>>
>> Major issues:
>>
>> Minor issues:
>>
>> It may be more cautious refer to the 'latest available' version of the IS-IS
>> standard as we cannot be completely sure that the Second Edition will also be
>> the very last one. Suggested change in Section 1:
>>
>> OLD:
>>
>>     All references to IS-IS should be to ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
>>     Edition and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.
>>
>> NEW:
>>
>>     All references to IS-IS should be to the latest edition of the IS-IS
>>     standard (currently ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
>>     Edition) and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.
>>
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>
>>
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email