Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 07 January 2014 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B95B1AE1DC for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 12:52:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9KFTb0LTkjAD for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 12:52:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2978F1AE1E5 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 12:52:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC462CC5D; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 22:52:27 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5LxH4U1w9lW7; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 22:52:27 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D332CC48; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 22:52:25 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <064c01cf0406$b1d07fa0$15717ee0$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:52:24 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B4F6D95A-F849-4E66-9661-DEFEA0570359@piuha.net>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA129F13C6@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <F3ADE4747C9E124B89F0ED2180CC814F23BDB1CE@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>, <52B1B033.6070507@gmail.com> <2e21e2d356bc46bd81b925abacbc1fa7@BLUPR05MB151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <064c01cf0406$b1d07fa0$15717ee0$@olddog.co.uk>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:52:41 -0000

Thanks Dan & all… I have placed a no-obj for this document.

Jari

On Dec 28, 2013, at 11:55 AM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Thanks,
> I added an RFC editor note.
> 
> Adrian
> 
>> From: Mike Shand
>> Sent: 18 December 2013 14:24:51 (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London
>> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Romascanu, Dan (Dan); gen-art@ietf.org
>> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
>> 
>> I agree.
>> 
>>     Mike
>> 
>> On 17/12/2013 14:52, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
>>> Dan -
>>> 
>>> Thanx for the review.
>>> I have no objection to your suggestion. I would hope this change can be done
>> by the RFC Editor.
>>> 
>>>    Les
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:35 AM
>>>> To: gen-art@ietf.org
>>>> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org
>>>> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-
>> ART,
>>>> please see the FAQ at
>>>> 
>>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>>> 
>>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
>> may
>>>> receive.
>>>> 
>>>> Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
>>>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>>>> Review Date: 12/17/13
>>>> IETF LC End Date: 12/24/13
>>>> IESG Telechat date:
>>>> 
>>>> Summary: Ready
>>>> 
>>>> Major issues:
>>>> 
>>>> Minor issues:
>>>> 
>>>> It may be more cautious refer to the 'latest available' version of the
> IS-IS
>>>> standard as we cannot be completely sure that the Second Edition will also
> be
>>>> the very last one. Suggested change in Section 1:
>>>> 
>>>> OLD:
>>>> 
>>>>    All references to IS-IS should be to ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
>>>>    Edition and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.
>>>> 
>>>> NEW:
>>>> 
>>>>    All references to IS-IS should be to the latest edition of the IS-IS
>>>>    standard (currently ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
>>>>    Edition) and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.
>>>> 
>>>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art