Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 07 January 2014 20:52 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B95B1AE1DC for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 12:52:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9KFTb0LTkjAD for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 12:52:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2978F1AE1E5 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 12:52:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC462CC5D; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 22:52:27 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5LxH4U1w9lW7; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 22:52:27 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D332CC48; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 22:52:25 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <064c01cf0406$b1d07fa0$15717ee0$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:52:24 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B4F6D95A-F849-4E66-9661-DEFEA0570359@piuha.net>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA129F13C6@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <F3ADE4747C9E124B89F0ED2180CC814F23BDB1CE@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>, <52B1B033.6070507@gmail.com> <2e21e2d356bc46bd81b925abacbc1fa7@BLUPR05MB151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <064c01cf0406$b1d07fa0$15717ee0$@olddog.co.uk>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:52:41 -0000
Thanks Dan & all… I have placed a no-obj for this document. Jari On Dec 28, 2013, at 11:55 AM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote: > Thanks, > I added an RFC editor note. > > Adrian > >> From: Mike Shand >> Sent: 18 December 2013 14:24:51 (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London >> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Romascanu, Dan (Dan); gen-art@ietf.org >> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org >> Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00 >> >> I agree. >> >> Mike >> >> On 17/12/2013 14:52, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: >>> Dan - >>> >>> Thanx for the review. >>> I have no objection to your suggestion. I would hope this change can be done >> by the RFC Editor. >>> >>> Les >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:35 AM >>>> To: gen-art@ietf.org >>>> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org >>>> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00 >>>> >>>> >>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen- >> ART, >>>> please see the FAQ at >>>> >>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >>>> >>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you >> may >>>> receive. >>>> >>>> Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00 >>>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu >>>> Review Date: 12/17/13 >>>> IETF LC End Date: 12/24/13 >>>> IESG Telechat date: >>>> >>>> Summary: Ready >>>> >>>> Major issues: >>>> >>>> Minor issues: >>>> >>>> It may be more cautious refer to the 'latest available' version of the > IS-IS >>>> standard as we cannot be completely sure that the Second Edition will also > be >>>> the very last one. Suggested change in Section 1: >>>> >>>> OLD: >>>> >>>> All references to IS-IS should be to ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second >>>> Edition and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest. >>>> >>>> NEW: >>>> >>>> All references to IS-IS should be to the latest edition of the IS-IS >>>> standard (currently ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second >>>> Edition) and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest. >>>> >>>> Nits/editorial comments: >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc11… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-r… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-r… Mike Shand
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-r… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-r… Jari Arkko