Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 28 December 2013 19:55 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB43E1AE2F0 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:55:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.147
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4kjPKH43tDvb for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE761AE26F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBSJst5p023459; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 19:54:55 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (108.26.90.92.rev.sfr.net [92.90.26.108]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBSJsrTF023453 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 28 Dec 2013 19:54:54 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA129F13C6@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <F3ADE4747C9E124B89F0ED2180CC814F23BDB1CE@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>, <52B1B033.6070507@gmail.com> <2e21e2d356bc46bd81b925abacbc1fa7@BLUPR05MB151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <2e21e2d356bc46bd81b925abacbc1fa7@BLUPR05MB151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 19:55:00 -0000
Message-ID: <064c01cf0406$b1d07fa0$15717ee0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQI+q0njfqQbFwCIwEWrMLormf0H1AHnwCC+ArTuJIcCgYipLZlRxJeA
Content-Language: en-gb
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 19:55:08 -0000
Thanks, I added an RFC editor note. Adrian > From: Mike Shand > Sent: 18 December 2013 14:24:51 (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Romascanu, Dan (Dan); gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org > Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00 > > I agree. > > Mike > > On 17/12/2013 14:52, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > > Dan - > > > > Thanx for the review. > > I have no objection to your suggestion. I would hope this change can be done > by the RFC Editor. > > > > Les > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:35 AM > >> To: gen-art@ietf.org > >> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org > >> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00 > >> > >> > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen- > ART, > >> please see the FAQ at > >> > >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > >> > >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you > may > >> receive. > >> > >> Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00 > >> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > >> Review Date: 12/17/13 > >> IETF LC End Date: 12/24/13 > >> IESG Telechat date: > >> > >> Summary: Ready > >> > >> Major issues: > >> > >> Minor issues: > >> > >> It may be more cautious refer to the 'latest available' version of the IS-IS > >> standard as we cannot be completely sure that the Second Edition will also be > >> the very last one. Suggested change in Section 1: > >> > >> OLD: > >> > >> All references to IS-IS should be to ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second > >> Edition and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest. > >> > >> NEW: > >> > >> All references to IS-IS should be to the latest edition of the IS-IS > >> standard (currently ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second > >> Edition) and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest. > >> > >> Nits/editorial comments: > >> > >> > >> > >
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc11… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-r… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-r… Mike Shand
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-r… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-r… Jari Arkko