IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Tue, 17 December 2013 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110401AE173 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 05:34:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5C3iEW2xmt0P for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 05:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3D51AE170 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 05:34:37 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqsMACVSsFKHCzI1/2dsb2JhbABZgmkhOFWjXZUMgSAWdIInAQEDEig/EgEVBw4UQiYBBA4NGodiAQymH6J8jSKBPzGDKoETBJlGhTyLKIMqgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,501,1384318800"; d="scan'208";a="41630609"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.53]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2013 08:34:36 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.12]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 17 Dec 2013 08:23:43 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.12]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:34:34 +0100
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
Thread-Index: Ac77LLhtN0tfxNI9TRWtvE6Vnwk1WA==
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:34:33 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA129F13C6@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.45]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:34:39 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 12/17/13
IETF LC End Date: 12/24/13
IESG Telechat date: 

Summary: Ready

Major issues:

Minor issues:

It may be more cautious refer to the 'latest available' version of the IS-IS standard as we cannot be completely sure that the Second Edition will also be the very last one. Suggested change in Section 1: 

OLD: 

   All references to IS-IS should be to ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
   Edition and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.

NEW: 

   All references to IS-IS should be to the latest edition of the IS-IS
   standard (currently ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
   Edition) and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.

Nits/editorial comments:

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email