[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-08

Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> Sun, 22 March 2015 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A80E1A1B0E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xG4YZy6PcCTK for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D2CA1A1B07 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-f79686d0000030a8-d1-550ed0619d58
Received: from EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain []) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 47.2E.12456.160DE055; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:23:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([]) by EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 16:28:53 -0400
From: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
To: "draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-08
Thread-Index: AdBk3qxllYz4F6enSIOijLT2ACZOxg==
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 20:28:51 +0000
Message-ID: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A3316DED6@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPgm7iBb5Qg08vNS2uHt7EanH11WcW ByaPJUt+Mnl8ufyZLYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugStj59W5jAV/BCuWtMQ1MN7n62Lk5JAQMJFY O3UbE4QtJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBI4wSUx8sZIJwljNKfJ+xmB2kik3AQmL77+esIAkRgQ2MEkvP LmMGSQgLhEpseDiJFcQWEYiS+Ht3FhuErSdx7OkFRhCbRUBVomH6NRYQm1fAV2L55+dgNiPQ 6u+n1oCdwSwgLnHryXyokwQkluw5zwxhi0q8fPyPFcJWkpjz+hozRL2OxILdn9ggbG2JZQtf M0PMF5Q4OfMJywRG4VlIxs5C0jILScssJC0LGFlWMXKUFqeW5aYbGWxiBIb3MQk23R2Me15a HmIU4GBU4uE1MOALFWJNLCuuzD3EKM3BoiTOu+jBwRAhgfTEktTs1NSC1KL4otKc1OJDjEwc nFINjCYv2GY8X/9uV13XgTunBOZrBcQxnLb/cvro33NXxPd/NepdOeHRgwTVzpvNXCv9ndZ1 +Z9lYznXm36naErMD/2/V9RF/ASaM3ln6Zz5JCR5ZGf2ujO6W+e/Pfwv65sx+1V9teBwl+uO AoynfDKO/t67tLCY5+Bi/WP5n8SLU6f2mjTM3jb9xV4lluKMREMt5qLiRACYsUU+UAIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/LnoDOOWAmzgmrGiWPijiLfcA6o0>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 20:28:56 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. 

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-08
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2015-03-21
IETF LC End Date:  2015-03-23
IESG Telechat date: NA

This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some comments.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
-[Page 1], "RPL" first used in title/abstract, Would be good to spell it out.
-[Page 5], Section 2, "Monitoring of functional correctness is at least as important.". As important as what? (not clear)
-[Page 5], Section 2, "Devices typically communicate their status regularly and send alarm messages notifying a malfunction of equipment or network."
Not clear what equipment is? network node is an equipment?
-[Page 6], Section 2.1, "for large installation"--->"for a large installation"
-[Page 8], Section 2.2.2, "fire detectors and the smoke dampers need to be put in place to meet the stringent delay requirements."
Where can we find a value for the delay requirement of fire detectors? A value or reference would be good.
-[Page 9], Section 2.2.4,"advanced scene and group control". Not clear what "scene" means.
-[Page 13], Section 4.1, "assumes the role as authoritative"--->"assumes the role of authoritative"
-[Page 16], section 4.1.8, please spell out first use CBC-MAC (Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code)
-[Page 16], section 4.1.10, it would be good to give the RFCs.
-[Page 16], section 4.2.4, MLE to spell out at first use "mesh link establishment"
-[Page 22], "CoAp" first used in section 7.4, but spelled out in section 8.
-[Page 18], section 5.1.1., "to throw away too late messages", how are too late messages identified?
-[Page 27], [I-D.ietf-6lo-lowpanz] to be replaced by RFC7428 
-[Page 28], link to [occuswitch] to be verified.
-Through the document both "ms" and "msec" are used. Selecting one for consistency would be better.

Best Regards,
Meral Shirazipour