[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-16ng-ps-goals-03
"Junghoon Jee" <jhjee@etri.re.kr> Tue, 11 December 2007 04:20 UTC
Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1wbh-00037X-Ce; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:20:33 -0500
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J1wbg-00037P-6z for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:20:32 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1wbf-00037H-TS for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:20:31 -0500
Received: from email1.etri.re.kr ([129.254.16.131] helo=email1.etri.info) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1wbd-0005Up-EW for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:20:31 -0500
Received: from etriabcb8a0047 ([129.254.112.107]) by email1.etri.info with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:27:01 +0900
Message-ID: <003601c83bad$2786dd30$6b70fe81@etriabcb8a0047>
From: Junghoon Jee <jhjee@etri.re.kr>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net>
References: <3EAF1D63-CC84-4BE6-ACA5-554E27E0290E@estacado.net> <000b01c83b9c$f8d625a0$6b70fe81@etriabcb8a0047> <0E6708AB-3829-43E1-AA37-05B87138FED7@estacado.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:20:25 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2007 04:27:01.0563 (UTC) FILETIME=[136280B0:01C83BAE]
X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: 34d35111647d654d033d58d318c0d21a
Cc: smadanapalli@gmail.com, soohong.park@samsung.com, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, maximilian.riegel@nsn.com, gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com, jeff@streetwaves-networks.com, townsley@cisco.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-16ng-ps-goals-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2003134549=="
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Thank Ben very much! The revised version will be ready ASAP by incorporating the changes. Best Regards, Junghoon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@estacado.net> To: "Junghoon Jee" <jhjee@etri.re.kr> Cc: "General Area Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>; <jari.arkko@piuha.net>; <maximilian.riegel@nsn.com>; <soohong.park@samsung.com>; <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com>; <jeff@streetwaves-networks.com>; <smadanapalli@gmail.com>; <townsley@cisco.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:22 PM Subject: Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-16ng-ps-goals-03 > > Thanks for the quick response! > > I think that the changes you propose will address my comments. > > Thanks! > > Ben. > > > On Dec 10, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Junghoon Jee wrote: > >> Dear Ben Campbell, >> Thank you for carefully reviewing the draft. >> Please find inline replies. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@estacado.net> >> To: "General Area Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org> >> Cc: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>; <maximilian.riegel@nsn.com>; <soohong.park@samsung.com >> >; <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com>; <jeff@streetwaves- >> networks.com>; <smadanapalli@gmail.com>; <jhjee@etri.re.kr>; <townsley@cisco.com >> > >> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 2:31 AM >> Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-16ng-ps-goals-03 >> >> >>> >>> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) >>> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see >>> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). >>> >>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >>> you may receive. >>> >>> >>> Document: draft-ietf-16ng-ps-goals-03 >>> Reviewer: Ben Campbell >>> Review Date: 10 December 2007 >>> IETF LC End Date: 10 December 2007 >>> IESG Telechat date: (if known) >>> >>> Summary: >>> >>> This document is almost ready for publication as an informational >>> RFC. >>> There are some editorial nits that should be addressed prior to >>> publication. >>> >>> Comments: >>> >>> General: There are many occurrences of missing articles ("a", "an", >>> or >>> "the") or the occasional use of an article where it does not belong. >>> While I assume that the RFC editors will fix these, it would same >>> them >>> some work if you did an additional proofreading pass for this sort of >>> thing. >> >> Yes, additional proofreading will be done ASAP and the next revision >> will apply the correction. >> >>> >>> Terminology Section, Definition of "Ethernet CS": >>> >>> It would be helpful to have a reference for 802.16 STD. >> >> That part will be amended that part like below: >> Ethernet CS: It means 802.3/Ethernet CS specific part of the Packet >> CS defined in [IEEE802.16]. >> >> IP CS terminology will also reference [IEEE802.16]. >> >>> >>> Section 4.1, paragraph 7: "In the first point-to-point link model..." >>> >>> I think you mean to refer to the first model in the preceding list, >>> which is the point-to-point link model. The wording sounds like you >>> mean the first of a set of point-to-point link models, which is >>> incorrect. I suggest just dropping the word "first". >> >> Right! >> Let me drop that word. >> >>> A similar issue occurs in paragraph 9 ("In the second Ethernet like >>> link model...") and 11 ("The last shared IPv6 prefix link model") >> >> Let me drop the 'second' and 'last' in them. >> >>> Section 4.1, paragraph 9: "There needs mechanisms ..." >>> >>> It looks like some words are missing from this sentence. >> >> Let me try to apply the following change: >> - From: There needs mechanisms like IEEE 802.1D to realize multicast >> and broadcast for Ethernet CS. >> - To: Therefore, we need a mechanism like 802.1D to realize >> multicast and broadcast. >> >>> >>> >>> Section 4.1, paragraph 10, starting with "Moreover, the frequent IP >>> multicast..." >>> >>> I had trouble parsing this paragraph in general. Also, Is "IP subnet >>> like ethernet" the same as "Ethernet like link model"? >> >> Let me try to apply the following change: >> - From: Moreover, the frequent IP multicast and broadcast signaling >> within the IP subnet like Ethernet needs to be avoided not to wake >> up sleep/idle [IEEE802.16e] SSs. >> - To: Moreover, the frequent IP multicast and broadcast signaling >> should be avoided not to wake up sleep/idle [IEEE802.16e] SSs. >> >> >>> >>> Section 4.1, last paragraph: >>> >>> "According to the point-to-point feature of 802.16's MAC, the Point- >>> to-Point link model is the feasible IP Subnet model for IP CS under >>> considering the multilink subnet problems. " >>> >>> I cannot parse this sentence--please rephrase. >> >> Let me try to apply the following change: >> - From: According to the point-to-point feature of 802.16's MAC, the >> Point-to-Point link model is the feasible IP Subnet model for IP CS >> under considering the multilink subnet problems. >> - To: According to the point-to-point feature of 802.16's MAC, the >> Point-to-Point link model is the feasible IP Subnet model in case of >> the IP CS. >> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Ben Campbell. >>> >> >> Best Regards, >> Junghoon >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-16ng-ps-go… Ben Campbell
- [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-16ng-p… Junghoon Jee
- [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-16ng-p… Ben Campbell
- [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-16ng-p… Junghoon Jee