IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-12

Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Thu, 10 December 2015 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFBD1A9072; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 05:02:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IfTzqPECPl3p; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 05:02:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AA4F1A1BF1; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 05:02:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BA4F35808; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:02:03 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rZt9l0aL3T1v; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:02:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dhcp2.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.172]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76FF5F357F9; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:02:02 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5669771C.9090208@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:02:00 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <41E99699-147B-48D9-9705-EDE0F70CB242@sobco.com>
References: <06b101d12dd7$423eb740$c6bc25c0$@gmail.com> <56692A72.1050403@um.es> <5669771C.9090208@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/maoWPLLYbbo8pORI-rVi0hMhVK4>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, Alejandro Pérez Méndez <alex@um.es>, draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-12
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:02:45 -0000

>> 
>>> 2.In general I was wondering why this is an Informational document. It
>>> defines procedures and has normative language.
>>> 
>> 
>> That sounds like kind of an unfortunate bug. For some reason, it changed
>> from Standards Track to Informational between versions -00 and -01.
>> However, we want it standards-track with a normative downreference to
>> radsec. Can it be done at this moment or does it require a more complex
>> process?
> 
> Hmm. The shepherd write-up says informational is correct. If the WG
> chairs want to, we can re-spin the IETF LC. But this has been so
> long in the process and has slowly so I'd prefer to not do that
> unless someone really cares, and it makes a difference.
> 
> For now, I've kept this on the Dec17 IESG telechat as informational
> but if needed we can push it into the new year.
> 

fwiw - 2026 requeres a new LC if there is to be a increase in the status (info to studs track) 

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email