[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pcn-sm-edge-behaviour-09

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 09 March 2012 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B88B21E8019 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:51:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.479, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B+fgOJsxFpva for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:51:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from morbo.mail.tigertech.net (morbo.mail.tigertech.net [67.131.251.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDD321F86B1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:51:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net (mailc2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.156]) by morbo.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65685CD4F7 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:51:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A21BA1102; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:51:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net
Received: from [10.10.10.100] (pool-71-161-51-182.clppva.btas.verizon.net [71.161.51.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D2B2A1103; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F5A5F41.7060107@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:51:29 -0500
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHBDyN6PN-vp9wXo6fF8G4VfODXjkfbWBaJN8EPopeWfOg9PmQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN6PN-vp9wXo6fF8G4VfODXjkfbWBaJN8EPopeWfOg9PmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
Subject: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pcn-sm-edge-behaviour-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:51:38 -0000

[Re-review for IESG Telechat.]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-pcn-sm-edge-behaviour-09
     PCN Boundary Node Behaviour for the Single Marking (SM) Mode of
                                Operation
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 9-march-2012
IETF LC End Date: past
IESG Telechat date: 15-March-2012

Summary: This documents is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

Thanks to the authors for addressing my concerns.