IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-eggert-ietf-and-trust-00.txt

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 22 October 2022 01:06 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2B4C14CE34 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id II-V5w4ahsHb for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2A7C14CF00 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id q19so11825309edd.10 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=i3egzJI5dNb37tzTqqfAQ5CBH7L8SsL1SXiiQvOky9Q=; b=Z2CEhfravd31iiy7uNnKNGZijoKn/ZK5joqL/kSXorS9p/0jeVWhPIp5WDX7mWpxRF MZbd9IifK4Dah2iFaxv7k9jTwWsSS3XFn2/hZE1H75L/kOWoZ2EljMEBucGEsGoZomMs uLwUEW4u7WzYAuNpNZn/Rha2bYHzBedexaXIHQ64NmECFkTz99IYMlHK+/J67n06VP3W hOiVM4Y43Zr3zxfk3h1kS3XTnsE1q8DeD0pQP3aJCZBEq8wlBYTTuFPgCJCiirXNyBvh iNHdQtswQHexz2mZYBtHD1kF3ZRchOYKiuMXSuLQTTmvyIYV93ShEJ8Ml6+kXAWxGkDB bN6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=i3egzJI5dNb37tzTqqfAQ5CBH7L8SsL1SXiiQvOky9Q=; b=PvNmJ6dghtTof5eIbEilacypeStNcb17xQPlCyl/7Ihl2DgYJfqFiQtfhDE8rZkwe8 wWTBROIdlG7P4choJBc7QMAZ5ucNigxg1xfl+Ytj+FDLLxEBsEC5ifqyxeZia65cVLFq G0bEawbYu56bUGW6sV25t4Sx8Xx9ldcBpAb733YUoOd4Wl36ckFG37jJpSOU7EEP6464 Av+4ZfbbYh/dIOLIALK/0dfHeTafqRDkjx3YNKXZt89ZwtsGWhSoKDo2hfyzL8dzXls5 +gMzh1oREDNTbpQQVgWfgeQ8cZX9qzWdsQ8hQxxstTCxfX64sNAZXsqqy239fr5BOy89 scSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2ETfGXvzF8X1vq0OSewbr8cm7JAwDrPRbjRMyjOE9wVku3dJbA Jpj9arXWDdL1rxZc6/bBVle3ZY4xkczNMmqN3vq1oE62
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM70bYQ6J70tkPJ2FanBGGyYhtG18ufw5JbXp60V18CTHM/VxDPNCa62O76FUuoG3zbusgyKO1LRlG/wnu+SWN8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:280a:b0:45d:19e8:c7ad with SMTP id h10-20020a056402280a00b0045d19e8c7admr19454873ede.44.1666400764135; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166618665532.36034.10051696461370688223@ietfa.amsl.com> <459bd8ff-5dcb-d2cd-9948-d492ba69cc17@gmail.com> <e84654be-992c-a9f2-1467-11e6d85120df@gmail.com> <CAChr6SzFGSWAacgCsDvhTo+dQ6P_zpcktyyKk4c7yHM8wA_mkg@mail.gmail.com> <77b4880f-5fe4-74f1-2562-07a86072c0da@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <77b4880f-5fe4-74f1-2562-07a86072c0da@joelhalpern.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:05:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SyByVqOx_bh2EeO_B13PJMnyfN1FeFLEtZQLz6xbQX=SQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000998cfe05eb9529f0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/CH3RoL6n0UD-ygwTtllJw-uJ-GQ>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-eggert-ietf-and-trust-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 01:06:06 -0000

That's a fine opinion. Why is there this extremely adversarial draft? I
think it's weird, even by IETF norms. Sorry if this is a derailment, but
questioning the books of the IETF Trust made me look twice.

thanks,
Rob


On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 5:53 PM Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> Well, one might disagree because 4 years ago there was no asset register,
> and now there is a relatively complete asset register.  No, it does not
> list every I-D and RFC.  because that would be redundant and a tremendous
> amount of work.
>
> Yours,
>
> Joel
> On 10/21/2022 8:29 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 5:13 PM Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Anyway - maintaining the asset register is an operational matter. It
>> should not be the target of a BCP.
>>
>
> The document seems to say they aren't doing that maintenance. I am not
> sure why anyone would disagree on that point.
>
> thanks,
> Rob
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email