Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-eggert-ietf-and-trust-00.txt

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Sat, 22 October 2022 00:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC78CC14CE34 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mASkECxqDkhz for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 419A3C14CF00 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MvN9q6ndGz6GcZ3; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1666399999; bh=XCGOrlWN/kqrrkjtjq0GKZIm7YUGdQlyj6XKMPaE8Ck=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=NFiTZ6mpggM3oQmJfkoRixW8cXFBGKxFEfmMKln4WZYlXd+O6sbNa4lqsPEikfkAG JsVYnXtQR49rKN3t042B4rEK0HEtcoMeGiorXJryCRVuF5yk+bTWEtiQSAkbyEE5tb BsHTANRIxTAlWBtF3OfbAcg8QXIUFBqQKV0TPn74=
X-Quarantine-ID: <l4OHEOW1kBTb>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.23.73] (unknown [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MvN9q2Jwcz6GWNm; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------Mbu0XJZJEoxXEg3NlIYs5nxu"
Message-ID: <77b4880f-5fe4-74f1-2562-07a86072c0da@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 20:53:16 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
References: <166618665532.36034.10051696461370688223@ietfa.amsl.com> <459bd8ff-5dcb-d2cd-9948-d492ba69cc17@gmail.com> <e84654be-992c-a9f2-1467-11e6d85120df@gmail.com> <CAChr6SzFGSWAacgCsDvhTo+dQ6P_zpcktyyKk4c7yHM8wA_mkg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SzFGSWAacgCsDvhTo+dQ6P_zpcktyyKk4c7yHM8wA_mkg@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/wR-Vstw078MmuWsZhKb_cANfn4Y>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-eggert-ietf-and-trust-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 00:53:24 -0000

Well, one might disagree because 4 years ago there was no asset 
register, and now there is a relatively complete asset register. No, it 
does not list every I-D and RFC.  because that would be redundant and a 
tremendous amount of work.

Yours,

Joel

On 10/21/2022 8:29 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 5:13 PM Brian E Carpenter 
> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>     Anyway - maintaining the asset register is an operational matter.
>     It should not be the target of a BCP.
>
>
> The document seems to say they aren't doing that maintenance. I am not 
> sure why anyone would disagree on that point.
>
> thanks,
> Rob
>