IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gendispatch] Re: Derivative Works: draft-sayre-gendispatch-deri vative-01

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 23 May 2026 07:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1367F3AB999 for <gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 23 May 2026 00:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1779522106; bh=pwkOXL+Ix4SA4gF38Jod3cEM59WndN58KTUO9H/+Yug=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=jYu4QAsE6L9GH7UMt2Gm05fSXt27uPt0uEMWdXbIV/nxCrXl1aTZC0ExQ7ZdejnC8 DdE1jftcb4xZRwrIr6XcOztDdNXLN9h7BnJlG4yP6+poLBk/Jh5RaBQVC8p3xOgz81 FXGg6SDD9bI/tdoZVQJaQxbsnt6+3Hq0WA8g7f54=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5yI8VlS_paTI for <gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 23 May 2026 00:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8352CF3AB884 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 May 2026 00:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.117.76.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 64N7dcMN018480 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 23 May 2026 00:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1779522012; x=1779608412; i=@elandsys.com; bh=pwkOXL+Ix4SA4gF38Jod3cEM59WndN58KTUO9H/+Yug=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=mnaENXsfV4d1UJVjxiy69uSJgpfwXf4AAqT8SwWqoW0aT9rssWVrK44M6g4v0BcLB t466IlNTSWUD7sXIeMTuKKgcCIUZA3Rh6i/BFAwYmZ+GUO9nIdFgZ79XCAMStvOthK X43S3FOhL3J4Awcd1J8lqRD81iNUuDJu51mBYCTg=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20260522234551.0a2204d0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 00:39:19 -0700
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>, gendispatch@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Sw_jBuhsc662uyhx9x1-Vikz61dszRVzBSa-kueS1Gt6g@mail.g mail.com>
References: <CAChr6Sw_jBuhsc662uyhx9x1-Vikz61dszRVzBSa-kueS1Gt6g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID-Hash: DZFS6ZRLHSB67JP4GVREWM2PP6BLQAMY
X-Message-ID-Hash: DZFS6ZRLHSB67JP4GVREWM2PP6BLQAMY
X-MailFrom: sm@elandsys.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Gendispatch] Re: Derivative Works: draft-sayre-gendispatch-deri vative-01
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/J32-jsUoCLeQfy4X6nqelReZjkM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:gendispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Rob,
At 03:55 PM 17-05-2026, Rob Sayre wrote:
>We have a new draft available. Brian Carpenter cleaned up the -00 
>version, and now we have something that I think we can all get on board with.

There is the word "disruptive" on Page 3 of the draft.  The usage is 
such that it has become an all-encompassing word for whatever someone 
in power did not like.

There is a section about confidentiality in RFC 5378.  If the text is 
tweaked, it could be used to have a similar effect to what 
draft-sayre-gendispatch-derivative seeks to do.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status