IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gendispatch] Re: [procon] Issue tracking [was Re: D erivative Works: draft-sayre-gendispatch-derivative-01]

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 15 July 2026 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32D41177B679 for <gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1784157005; bh=CtjKCbjdQcxFiYC8ysqrDrOjzSqXiAZwrq1VxwUaULs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=hpQtqtdTIkfsT21oHNkgF0/OLTjHP0sMK/LUz3ODXg/Vm/6JTc+UcRPpfLuUiJkuO gPujs0cGCMQqhGaawgWYLRIS47suVW6rPmJJjviwYNpSc0vS5WXXbirITrjl/LRTrA HJIEQPYBJn24u8FWCqNGjFEBDRXXoJBga6Ei9Xik=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YFcBFQC6Vy-H for <gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C7F1177B676 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.226.15.164]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 66FN90J8019589 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1784156976; x=1784243376; i=@elandsys.com; bh=CtjKCbjdQcxFiYC8ysqrDrOjzSqXiAZwrq1VxwUaULs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=bHZxh43Y4eqx19WFlNPUKp4vUk6/entqRlZ3mJ8HrEQCoD4RsuFjsaWnpLVZgYwfw qJb+dRs73ZZPytcETKO6XWqBErGEwK6ihDkNUOzqdO9jP7P6CMOsoFIosapkexM8zs WqeNay0xcUgxZFPPd94iv+61KlvHE5j0BwMJjguc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20260715153929.129fa140@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:07:37 -0700
To: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>, gendispatch@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <20260715223228.886717.qmail@cr.yp.to>
References: <6cab9c47-3f63-4c86-8332-08d248e4a612@gmail.com> <20260715223228.886717.qmail@cr.yp.to>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID-Hash: XQG5JB7HNA5QBJ5QM3WSSMSHQBLBGWYP
X-Message-ID-Hash: XQG5JB7HNA5QBJ5QM3WSSMSHQBLBGWYP
X-MailFrom: sm@elandsys.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Gendispatch] Re: [procon] Issue tracking [was Re: D erivative Works: draft-sayre-gendispatch-derivative-01]
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/cRxo2HSm4wxt03m3vhdKjicgLbQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:gendispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-leave@ietf.org>

Dear Professor Bernstein,

I read your email dated July 15.  Now, I see what you are getting 
at.  A participant files an objection (appeal). The person(s) 
considering the objection does not need to modify the filing.  The 
person(s) might wish to cite specific parts of the filing, e.g. IESG 
response dated July 4, 2010.  That could be the "derivative works" angle.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status