Re: [Geopriv] New indoor location - standards needed

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com> Thu, 04 December 2014 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293201A86DF for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:40:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <NubvGXewQStx>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NubvGXewQStx for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:40:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9643D1A8547 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:40:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1417732800; x=1449268800; h=x-ojodefuego:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer: date:to:from:subject:cc:content-type; bh=IrJRTDwumjmNcjZQaXV/WZe3OSa0EV07fsvIDXZZyi4=; b=D47UC0o+B9Y7BgOMQ4T7SpHlBNBoSRW8BxqjW9rE8d3j40wfOu9MDW/g GfIK2IHYv1xnhMmrl/Y8ixWD66IXoPPn+gRrZ9157FpwEh4aC8zYKESCT 2F6BlBpWmCoEos3ZqwVBCZugwksthDCJiD9RVLXBrWfBbfXgdRll0CwcV k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5600,1067,7642"; a="79485107"
Received: from ironmsg02-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.16]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 04 Dec 2014 14:40:00 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,518,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="408895504"
Received: from plus.qualcomm.com ([10.52.255.8]) by ironmsg02-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 04 Dec 2014 14:40:00 -0800
Received: from Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com (ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com [172.30.46.18]) by plus.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id sB4MdxW8012847; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:39:59 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,518,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="860010547"
X-ojodefuego: yes
Received: from myvpn-l-01457.ras.qualcomm.com (HELO [99.111.97.136]) ([10.64.140.63]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2014 14:39:57 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240611d0a690cf4b98@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D05BDECECD@fcc.gov> <DD99156A-AD32-4B8B-B7D1-7D8509B44CAA@neustar.biz>
References: <D0A4CFA5.68817%mlinsner@cisco.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B28BBA1@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lu c ent.com> <p0624060dd0a5a3cce274@[99.111.97.136]> <51581CA9D0965243B6931E4CDEDF3E4504CFB3A160@lmv08-mx02.corp.intrado.p r i> <,> <0109FDD4-FABA-45DF-9389-E56D58F65E90@neustar.biz> <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D05BDECD31@fcc.gov> <p0624060dd0a668d6ed06@[99.111.97.136]>, <DD99156A-AD32-4B8B-B7D1-7D8509B44CAA@neustar.biz> <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D05BDECECD@fcc.gov> <DD99156A-AD32-4B8B-B7D1-7D8509B44CAA@neustar.biz>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:33:39 -0800
To: "Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>, Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/-8wVJMmoDJFIIYEOHSA2ghqtJ3U
Cc: geopriv <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] New indoor location - standards needed
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:40:02 -0000

At 7:49 PM +0000 12/4/14, Brian Rosen wrote:

>  might work, but SUPL isn't deployed outside 3G/4G networks, so I 
> suspect that's not what we would recommend.

At 8:43 PM +0000 12/4/14, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:

>  For SUPL, wouldn't OMA, rather than ATIS, be the right body to do the work?

This illustrates why we need coordination among the involved SDOs and 
why the IETF shouldn't jump prematurely to propose a protocol.  We 
don't want ATIS and the IETF developing mutually incompatible 
approaches.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
Knowledge always desires increase; it is like fire, which must
first be kindled by some external agent, but which will afterwards
propagate itself.                       --Dr. Samuel Johnson