Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharterof GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv)

["James M. Polk" <[e-mail]>]

Martin

Thinking out loud - what's preventing those 
stakeholders from implementing what's in the 
identity ext work? Surely it's not because it's not an RFC..?

James

At 11:36 PM 6/17/2009, Dawson, Martin wrote:
>While that matter of degree is open to 
>interpretation, we've heard from a number of 
>stakeholders who actually need to implement the 
>identity extension work. Can the same be said for filters?
>
>Cheers,
>Martin
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [e-mail] 
>[mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Brian Rosen
>Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2009 9:06 AM
>To: Thomson, Martin; 'Cullen Jennings'; [e-mail]
>Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>Subject: Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharterof 
>GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv)
>
>Although the XML is undergoing substantial 
>change, the basic filter mechanisms have, I 
>believe, stabilized.  In conjunction with the 
>throttle and basic 4661 filter, when we get the 
>XML right (meaning, in alignment with 4661), then I think we're done.
>
>So, I don't think it's far less mature.
>
>Brian
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
> > Behalf Of Thomson, Martin
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 9:32 PM
> > To: Cullen Jennings; [e-mail]
> > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Subject: Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of
> > GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv)
> >
> > The work on filters is far less mature than the identity work.  Unless
> > Brian has hidden wonders in store, I'd suggest that that work can wait.
> >
> > --Martin
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
> > > Behalf Of Cullen Jennings
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 17 June 2009 8:27 AM
> > > To: <[e-mail]>
> > > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > > Subject: Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of
> > > GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv)
> > >
> > >
> > > Would people advise that we remove any of the currently proposed
> > > milestones until after the identity and work it depends on got
> > > completed?
> > >
> > > On Jun 16, 2009, at 7:33 , <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I kindly ask that draft-winterbottom-geopriv-held-identity-
> > > > extensions be considered for inclusion in the rechartered geopriv
> > > > Goals and Milestones. As discussed at the June 2008 geopriv interim
> > > > meeting, this extension to the basic HELD protocol is required for
> > > > some deployments.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Guy
> > > >
> > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > De : [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] De
> > > > la part de IESG Secretary
> > > > Envoyé : 9 juin 2009 12:00
> > > > À : [e-mail]
> > > > Cc : [e-mail]
> > > > Objet : [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic Location/
> > > > Privacy (geopriv)
> > > >
> > > > A modified charter has been submitted for the Geographic Location/
> > > > Privacy
> > > > (geopriv) working group in the Real-time Applications and
> > > > Infrastructure
> > > > Area of the IETF.  The IESG has not made any determination as yet.
> > > > The
> > > > modified charter is provided below for informational purposes only.
> > > > Please send your comments to the IESG mailing list ([e-mail])
> > by
> > > > Tuesday, June 16, 2009.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Geographic Location/Privacy (geopriv)
> > > > --------------------------------------
> > > > Last Modified: 2009-05-29
> > > >
> > > > Chair(s):
> > > > - Richard Barnes <[e-mail]>
> > > > - Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]>
> > > >
> > > > Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Director(s):
> > > > - Robert Sparks <[e-mail]>
> > > > - Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]>
> > > >
> > > > Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Advisor:
> > > > - Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]>
> > > >
> > > > Technical Advisor(s):
> > > > - Lisa Dusseault <[e-mail]>
> > > >
> > > > Mailing Lists:
> > > > General Discussion: [e-mail]
> > > > To Subscribe: [e-mail]
> > > > In Body: subscribe
> > > > Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/index.html
> > > >
> > > > Description of Working Group:
> > > >
> > > > The IETF has recognized that many applications are emerging that
> > > > require geographic and civic location information about resources
> > and
> > > > entities, and that the representation and transmission of that
> > > > information has significant privacy and security implications. We
> > > have
> > > > created a suite of protocols that allow such applications to
> > > represent
> > > > and transmit such location objects and to allow users to express
> > > > policies on how these representations are exposed and used. The
> > IETF
> > > > has also begun working on creating applications that use these
> > > > capabilities, for emergency services, general real-time
> > > communication,
> > > > and other usages.
> > > >
> > > > The GEOPRIV working group is chartered to continue to develop and
> > > > refine representations of location in Internet protocols, and to
> > > > analyze the authorization, integrity, and privacy requirements that
> > > > must be met when these representations of location are created,
> > > > stored, and used. The group will create and refine mechanisms for
> > the
> > > > transmission of these representations that address the requirements
> > > > that have been identified.
> > > >
> > > > The working group will work with other IETF working groups and
> > other
> > > > standards development organizations that are building applications
> > > > that use location information to ensure that the requirements are
> > > well
> > > > understood and met, and that no additional security or privacy
> > issues
> > > > related to location are left unaddressed as these location
> > > information
> > > > is incorporated into other protocols.
> > > >
> > > > It remains a goal of the GEOPRIV working group to deliver
> > > > specifications of broad applicability that will become mandatory to
> > > > implement for IETF protocols that are location aware.
> > > >
> > > > This working group will not develop location-determining
> > technology.
> > > > However, the IETF acknowledges that information used in the
> > location-
> > > > determination process will in some cases need to be carried over
> > the
> > > > Internet. Where necessary, this working group will develop
> > protocols
> > > > or protocol extensions to encode location-determination data
> > > > structures defined elsewhere. This working group will not develop
> > > > technologies to directly address any particular regulatory
> > > > requirements (e.g. 9-1-1). The group will continue to coordinate
> > with
> > > > any other IETF entities that are working on those problems to
> > ensure
> > > > the technologies created here meet the needs of those entities, and
> > > > that the authorization, integrity, and privacy requirements on the
> > > > mechanisms provided by these technologies continue to be met.
> > > >
> > > > Goals and Milestones:
> > > >
> > > > Done Discuss initial geopriv scenarios and application requirements
> > > >     i-d's
> > > > Done Discuss initial geographic location privacy and security
> > > >     requirements i-d.
> > > > Done Initial i-d on geographic information protocol design,
> > including
> > > >     privacy and security techniques.
> > > > Done Review charter and initial i-ds with AD, and have IESG
> > consider
> > > >     rechartering if necessary.
> > > > Done Submit geopriv scenarios and application requirements to IESG
> > > for
> > > >     publication as Informational RFCs
> > > > Done Submit security/privacy requirements I-D to IESG for
> > publication
> > > >     As Informational RFC.
> > > > Done Submit PIDF-LO basic geopriv object draft as a PS
> > > > Done Initial Common Rules base object draft
> > > > Done Initial Common Rules GEOPRIV object draft
> > > > Done Submit DHCP Civil draft as a PS
> > > > Done Resubmit Conveying Location Objects in RADIUS and Diameter to
> > > >     the IESG for publication as PS
> > > > Done Submit Additional Civic PIDF-LO types (updating 4119) to the
> > > >     IESG for publication as PS
> > > > Done Submit minimal HTTP based protocol satisfying baseline
> > > >     requirements specified in the Layer 7 Location Conveyance
> > > Protocol
> > > >     Problem Statement and Requirements to the IESG for publication
> > as
> > > >     PS
> > > > Done Submit PIDF-LO Usage Clarifications and Recommendations
> > > >     (updating 4119) to the IESG for publication as PS
> > > > Done Submit Layer 7 Location Conveyance Protocol Problem Statement
> > > >     and Requirements to the IESG for publication as Informational
> > > > Done Submit recommendations for representing civic addresses in
> > > >     PIDF-LO to the IESG for publication as BCP
> > > > Done Submit Recommendations for Retransmission in SIP Location
> > > >     Conveyance to the IESG for publication as Informational
> > > > Done Submit Requirements for Location by Reference Protocols to
> > > >     the IESG for publication as Informational
> > > > Done Submit a LIS Discovery Mechanism to the IESG for publication
> > as
> > > a
> > > >     PS
> > > > Jun 2009 Resubmit Geolocation Policy to the IESG for publication as
> > > PS
> > > > Sep 2009 Submit an draft for DHCP geodetic location to the IESG for
> > > >     publication as PS to obsolete 3825
> > > > Sep 2009 Submit an Architecture for Location and Location Privacy
> > > >     to the IESG for publication as Informational
> > > > Dec 2009 Submit a URI scheme for directly expressing geodetic
> > > location
> > > >     to the IESG for publication as PS
> > > > Dec 2009 Submit a DHCP Option for a Location Uniform Resource
> > > >     Identifier (URI) to the IESG for publication as PS
> > > > Dec 2009 Submit a Document Format for Filtering and Reporting PIDF-
> > LO
> > > >     Location Notifications to the IESG for publication as PS
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Geopriv mailing list
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Geopriv mailing list
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Geopriv mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------------------
> > This message is for the designated recipient only and may
> > contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> > If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> > immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
> > this email is prohibited.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------------------
> > [mf2]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geopriv mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
>_______________________________________________
>Geopriv mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This message is for the designated recipient only and may
>contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
>If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
>this email is prohibited.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>[mf2]
>
>_______________________________________________
>Geopriv mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv