Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic Location/Privacy (geopriv)

[Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]>]

Would people advise that we remove any of the currently proposed  
milestones until after the identity and work it depends on got  
completed?

On Jun 16, 2009, at 7:33 , <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I kindly ask that draft-winterbottom-geopriv-held-identity- 
> extensions be considered for inclusion in the rechartered geopriv  
> Goals and Milestones. As discussed at the June 2008 geopriv interim  
> meeting, this extension to the basic HELD protocol is required for  
> some deployments.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guy
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] De  
> la part de IESG Secretary
> Envoyé : 9 juin 2009 12:00
> À : [e-mail]
> Cc : [e-mail]
> Objet : [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic Location/ 
> Privacy (geopriv)
>
> A modified charter has been submitted for the Geographic Location/ 
> Privacy
> (geopriv) working group in the Real-time Applications and  
> Infrastructure
> Area of the IETF.  The IESG has not made any determination as yet.   
> The
> modified charter is provided below for informational purposes only.
> Please send your comments to the IESG mailing list ([e-mail]) by
> Tuesday, June 16, 2009.
>
>
> Geographic Location/Privacy (geopriv)
> --------------------------------------
> Last Modified: 2009-05-29
>
> Chair(s):
> - Richard Barnes <[e-mail]>
> - Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]>
>
> Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Director(s):
> - Robert Sparks <[e-mail]>
> - Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]>
>
> Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Advisor:
> - Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]>
>
> Technical Advisor(s):
> - Lisa Dusseault <[e-mail]>
>
> Mailing Lists:
> General Discussion: [e-mail]
> To Subscribe: [e-mail]
> In Body: subscribe
> Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/index.html
>
> Description of Working Group:
>
> The IETF has recognized that many applications are emerging that
> require geographic and civic location information about resources and
> entities, and that the representation and transmission of that
> information has significant privacy and security implications. We have
> created a suite of protocols that allow such applications to represent
> and transmit such location objects and to allow users to express
> policies on how these representations are exposed and used. The IETF
> has also begun working on creating applications that use these
> capabilities, for emergency services, general real-time communication,
> and other usages.
>
> The GEOPRIV working group is chartered to continue to develop and
> refine representations of location in Internet protocols, and to
> analyze the authorization, integrity, and privacy requirements that
> must be met when these representations of location are created,
> stored, and used. The group will create and refine mechanisms for the
> transmission of these representations that address the requirements
> that have been identified.
>
> The working group will work with other IETF working groups and other
> standards development organizations that are building applications
> that use location information to ensure that the requirements are well
> understood and met, and that no additional security or privacy issues
> related to location are left unaddressed as these location information
> is incorporated into other protocols.
>
> It remains a goal of the GEOPRIV working group to deliver
> specifications of broad applicability that will become mandatory to
> implement for IETF protocols that are location aware.
>
> This working group will not develop location-determining technology.
> However, the IETF acknowledges that information used in the location-
> determination process will in some cases need to be carried over the
> Internet. Where necessary, this working group will develop protocols
> or protocol extensions to encode location-determination data
> structures defined elsewhere. This working group will not develop
> technologies to directly address any particular regulatory
> requirements (e.g. 9-1-1). The group will continue to coordinate with
> any other IETF entities that are working on those problems to ensure
> the technologies created here meet the needs of those entities, and
> that the authorization, integrity, and privacy requirements on the
> mechanisms provided by these technologies continue to be met.
>
> Goals and Milestones:
>
> Done Discuss initial geopriv scenarios and application requirements
>     i-d's
> Done Discuss initial geographic location privacy and security
>     requirements i-d.
> Done Initial i-d on geographic information protocol design, including
>     privacy and security techniques.
> Done Review charter and initial i-ds with AD, and have IESG consider
>     rechartering if necessary.
> Done Submit geopriv scenarios and application requirements to IESG for
>     publication as Informational RFCs
> Done Submit security/privacy requirements I-D to IESG for publication
>     As Informational RFC.
> Done Submit PIDF-LO basic geopriv object draft as a PS
> Done Initial Common Rules base object draft
> Done Initial Common Rules GEOPRIV object draft
> Done Submit DHCP Civil draft as a PS
> Done Resubmit Conveying Location Objects in RADIUS and Diameter to
>     the IESG for publication as PS
> Done Submit Additional Civic PIDF-LO types (updating 4119) to the
>     IESG for publication as PS
> Done Submit minimal HTTP based protocol satisfying baseline
>     requirements specified in the Layer 7 Location Conveyance Protocol
>     Problem Statement and Requirements to the IESG for publication as
>     PS
> Done Submit PIDF-LO Usage Clarifications and Recommendations
>     (updating 4119) to the IESG for publication as PS
> Done Submit Layer 7 Location Conveyance Protocol Problem Statement
>     and Requirements to the IESG for publication as Informational
> Done Submit recommendations for representing civic addresses in
>     PIDF-LO to the IESG for publication as BCP
> Done Submit Recommendations for Retransmission in SIP Location
>     Conveyance to the IESG for publication as Informational
> Done Submit Requirements for Location by Reference Protocols to
>     the IESG for publication as Informational
> Done Submit a LIS Discovery Mechanism to the IESG for publication as a
>     PS
> Jun 2009 Resubmit Geolocation Policy to the IESG for publication as PS
> Sep 2009 Submit an draft for DHCP geodetic location to the IESG for
>     publication as PS to obsolete 3825
> Sep 2009 Submit an Architecture for Location and Location Privacy
>     to the IESG for publication as Informational
> Dec 2009 Submit a URI scheme for directly expressing geodetic location
>     to the IESG for publication as PS
> Dec 2009 Submit a DHCP Option for a Location Uniform Resource
>     Identifier (URI) to the IESG for publication as PS
> Dec 2009 Submit a Document Format for Filtering and Reporting PIDF-LO
>     Location Notifications to the IESG for publication as PS
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv