IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] IPR disclosure on draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 19 July 2012 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5170C21F869A for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.956
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.956 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.357, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BuF1E49-qj9O for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A2521F8679 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkty7 with SMTP id y7so2742151bkt.31 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yz0FS3hjyAJ8S78daQNpOPltC2gnlpKLchjAaMSYAzI=; b=A1QNCVwX6YVU6iulZf8tfltWVohouVSRldmgmLnd3XezI13EsaSJQZJg8iCMTPfmB5 Xjy6mszVvBuLDuK1XAksoFbpsL9BKFxbz4q57BOwJ7gHluAyawF87c42Pm96uc0wy+tq U9kvEChgVMHqPNGJ/mfU8ymAehP1UJNOEO9O34u2y8VEnXbla91wXmhkIidZ+n4QtFaf yWwx01DgftVGcJQD9558PDozRJax5GFS6R2x82kosbONEuAS+QXY5sv5UH9hb3hRakLh NtoQwXx8KXZ/571qEpudb6qN60oYrsunP4+Iz4Ntqgjg4232/4bAN28f2QXFAIPE0628 nQnA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.205.123.134 with SMTP id gk6mr1774291bkc.3.1342731050576; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.66.17 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A903434F-92D7-4D55-B18E-1F6BADA319EF@brianrosen.net>
References: <B5972D72-AF7D-47C3-9F7D-E25332EE597A@bbn.com> <0FBBE6A0-3620-48E4-8778-4B940A10D9B6@bbn.com> <A903434F-92D7-4D55-B18E-1F6BADA319EF@brianrosen.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:50:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXrEYXzchdZm1qXCtUx-a=1oZiYwa8JNWr4CCwBJWsQgw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] IPR disclosure on draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:49:58 -0000

I see no reason not to proceed.  The usual caveats apply.

On 19 July 2012 13:28, Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net> wrote:
> I agree.  I have read the patent and do not believe there is a problem with respect to implementing deref.  I suppose it would be possible to use deref to build a system which violates the patent, but I believe that most uses won't, and therefore I think we should proceed.
>
> IANAL
>
> Brian
>
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 4:09 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
>
>> <hat type="individual" />
>>
>> Having read the patent, I do not think that it is required to implement draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol.  As I understand it, the patent covers a location-based access control system, which could use deref, but which is not a requirement of deref.
>>
>> So I would be OK with deref proceeding in spite of this IPR claim.
>>
>> --Richard
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 19, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
>>
>>> Dear GEOPRIV,
>>>
>>> An IPR disclosure has been filed against a GEOPPRIV document, draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol.  This document has been through working group last call, IETF last call, and IESG approval.  Its last DISCUSS was cleared 12 July 2012, but Robert is delaying final approval until this IPR question has been resolved.
>>>
>>> Please send comment to the list by Friday, 20 July 2012, if you have concerns related to this IPR disclosure.
>>>
>>> Note that the patent disclosed in this disclosure was also disclosed with regard to other GEOPRIV documents that proceeded to publication:
>>> RFC 3693: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/960/>
>>> RFC 4079: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/959/>
>>> RFC 4119: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/958/>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> GEOPRIV Chairs
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geopriv mailing list
>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geopriv mailing list
>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email