IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] IPR disclosure on draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol

Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net> Fri, 20 July 2012 13:21 UTC

Return-Path: <br@brianrosen.net>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341FD21F8629 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.718
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.718 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.119, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydt3vO2uiomI for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from barmail6.idig.net (barmail6.idig.net [64.34.111.239]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A2321F861B for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1342790544-0538de37f663a7f0001-fOFzYG
Received: from wwh1.winweblinux.com (wwh1.winweblinux.com [76.74.186.184]) by barmail6.idig.net with ESMTP id unIN68ye5DB4mGVS; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: br@brianrosen.net
X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 76.74.186.184
Received: from neustargw.va.neustar.com ([209.173.53.233]:15236 helo=[192.168.133.1]) by wwh1.winweblinux.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <br@brianrosen.net>) id 1SsDA0-001GLh-JX; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:22:24 -0700
References: <B5972D72-AF7D-47C3-9F7D-E25332EE597A@bbn.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE240AE8633@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE240AE8633@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <E2B47B28-5C47-4546-85B4-F9E0B1A892D3@brianrosen.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:22:22 -0400
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Geopriv] IPR disclosure on draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Barracuda-Connect: wwh1.winweblinux.com[76.74.186.184]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1342790544
X-Barracuda-URL: http://64.34.111.239:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at idig.net
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=3.5 tests=BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.103248 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO Envelope rcpt doesn't match header
Cc: "geopriv@ietf.org" <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] IPR disclosure on draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:21:30 -0000

Thanks for the reminder.

Based on the information available, I would say "proceed".

Brian

On Jul 20, 2012, at 5:50 AM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:

> Could I just point out that discussion of the validity, or not, of the claims made in the declaration or in the claimed IPR itself are not something the working group should be discussing.
> 
> The WG merely needs to make a decision, based on the IPR declaration, and the references therefrom, as to whether it should proceed with the current technical solution, or to adopt an alternative technical solution (or no solution at all).
> 
> Saying "proceed" can encompass everything from "I don't believe the claims are valid" to "The claims are valid but I am prepared to pay the license fee to get this technical solution", but you don't need to tell the working group any of that, particularly if it leads to a discussion of whether your statement is correct or not.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Keith
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Richard L. Barnes
>> Sent: 19 July 2012 20:58
>> To: geopriv@ietf.org
>> Subject: [Geopriv] IPR disclosure on draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol
>> 
>> Dear GEOPRIV,
>> 
>> An IPR disclosure has been filed against a GEOPPRIV document, draft-ietf-
>> geopriv-deref-protocol.  This document has been through working group last
>> call, IETF last call, and IESG approval.  Its last DISCUSS was cleared 12
>> July 2012, but Robert is delaying final approval until this IPR question
>> has been resolved.
>> 
>> Please send comment to the list by Friday, 20 July 2012, if you have
>> concerns related to this IPR disclosure.
>> 
>> Note that the patent disclosed in this disclosure was also disclosed with
>> regard to other GEOPRIV documents that proceeded to publication:
>> RFC 3693: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/960/>
>> RFC 4079: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/959/>
>> RFC 4119: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/958/>
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> GEOPRIV Chairs
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geopriv mailing list
>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email