Re: [Geopriv] IPR disclosure on draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol

"Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com> Thu, 19 July 2012 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rbarnes@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0827E21F8702 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.592
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.592 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.007, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SzcNriviqLPv for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3040721F870A for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ros-dhcp192-1-51-20.bbn.com ([192.1.51.20]:62413) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <rbarnes@bbn.com>) id 1Srx2s-0007uQ-W1 for geopriv@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:09:59 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
From: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <B5972D72-AF7D-47C3-9F7D-E25332EE597A@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:09:58 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0FBBE6A0-3620-48E4-8778-4B940A10D9B6@bbn.com>
References: <B5972D72-AF7D-47C3-9F7D-E25332EE597A@bbn.com>
To: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] IPR disclosure on draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:09:06 -0000

<hat type="individual" />

Having read the patent, I do not think that it is required to implement draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol.  As I understand it, the patent covers a location-based access control system, which could use deref, but which is not a requirement of deref.

So I would be OK with deref proceeding in spite of this IPR claim.

--Richard



On Jul 19, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:

> Dear GEOPRIV,
> 
> An IPR disclosure has been filed against a GEOPPRIV document, draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol.  This document has been through working group last call, IETF last call, and IESG approval.  Its last DISCUSS was cleared 12 July 2012, but Robert is delaying final approval until this IPR question has been resolved.
> 
> Please send comment to the list by Friday, 20 July 2012, if you have concerns related to this IPR disclosure.  
> 
> Note that the patent disclosed in this disclosure was also disclosed with regard to other GEOPRIV documents that proceeded to publication:
> RFC 3693: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/960/>
> RFC 4079: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/959/>
> RFC 4119: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/958/>
> 
> Thanks,
> GEOPRIV Chairs 
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv