Please us an appropriate subject line : Re: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 21 November 2007 21:53 UTC
Return-path: <geopriv-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuxVK-0005zq-U5; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:53:06 -0500
Received: from geopriv by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IuxVK-0005y4-5C for geopriv-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:53:06 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuxVJ-0005xv-RX for geopriv@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:53:05 -0500
Received: from nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net ([2001:470:1f03:267::2] helo=nostrum.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuxVI-0006yu-LO for geopriv@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:53:05 -0500
Received: from [192.168.2.235] (pool-96-226-64-76.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [96.226.64.76]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lALLr0xR028782 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:53:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
In-Reply-To: <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF1039E5707@AHQEX1.andrew.com>
References: <7582BC68E4994F4ABF0BD4723975C3FA04F176CC@crexc41p> <007101c82c67$87ebf2a0$2f0d0d0a@cisco.com> <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF1039E56D8@AHQEX1.andrew.com> <XFE-SJC-212GDrPixj6000013af@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com> <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF1039E5707@AHQEX1.andrew.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <A950505F-D494-4CB0-8B35-E9BADEF30C21@nostrum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Please us an appropriate subject line : Re: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:53:00 -0600
To: "Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 96.226.64.76 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4873/Wed Nov 21 12:51:49 2007 on shaman.nostrum.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: 140baa79ca42e6b0e2b4504291346186
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org, Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com>, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
Hi folks - For _every_ post you send to this list, please look at the subject line and make sure it's still on topic. The last several messages posted to _this_ topic are going to be really hard to find in the archive later. RjS On Nov 21, 2007, at 3:33 PM, Winterbottom, James wrote: > Hi James, > > Sorry, I was just trying to present the use-case and document the > existing requirements. Comes about as a force of habit with this WG... > *8) > > Cheers > James > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: James M. Polk [mailto:jmpolk@cisco.com] >> Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2007 8:26 AM >> To: Winterbottom, James; Marc Linsner; Stark, Barbara; >> rjsparks@nostrum.com; geopriv@ietf.org >> Subject: RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 >> >> James >> >> You can reply without being so incredibly defensive, can't you? >> >> At 02:42 PM 11/21/2007, Winterbottom, James wrote: >>> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message >>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; >>> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C82C7E.FAF514D5" >>> >>> Marc, >>> >>> Suppose the identifier is a MAC address, since this has no formal >>> URI representation then what? >>> Suppose HELD is bound to a transport other than HTTP, such as in >>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-geopriv-held-beep- >> 01>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-geopriv-held-beep-01, >>> how are the parameters simply added to the URI? Does it even make >>> sense to do so? >>> >>> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps- >> > 06.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-l7- > lcp-ps- >> 06.txt >>> indicates that identifiers other than IP address will be required in >>> some scenarios. >>> >>> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp- >> 03.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp- >> 03.txt >>> identifies the need, in some situations, for an outbound proxy to >>> insert location on-behalf-of the calling device. In this situation >>> using HELD requires a formal way to express how the Device is being >>> identified, and what the identifier represents. >>> >>> Please read the draft >>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-winterbottom-geopriv-held- >>> identity- >> > extensions-04>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-winterbottom-geopriv- > held > - >> identity-extensions-04 >>> before jumping on to the attack. >>> >>> There are several architectures and deployments well underway that >>> require this work. The ABNF definitions in the extensions draft have >>> applicability beyond just HELD. I don't see a need to delay this >>> work >> further. >>> >>> Cheers >>> James >>> >>> >>> ---------- >>> From: Marc Linsner [mailto:mlinsner@cisco.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2007 4:54 AM >>> To: 'Stark, Barbara'; rjsparks@nostrum.com; geopriv@ietf.org >>> Subject: RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 >>> >>> Barbara, >>> >>> Remind me again why this can't be accomplished by putting the >>> identifier in the uri? ex: >>> <mailto:identifier@accessprovider.net>identifier@accessprovider.net >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -Marc- >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- >>> From: Stark, Barbara [mailto:bs7652@att.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 12:17 PM >>> To: rjsparks@nostrum.com; geopriv@ietf.org >>> Subject: Re: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 >>> >>> Robert, >>> I think the HELD identity extensions is important. It's needed for >>> LIS to LIS communication, which is critical where the entity who >>> assigns the public IP address is not the same as the access >>> provider. >>> Barbara >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> >>> To: GEOPRIV <geopriv@ietf.org> >>> Sent: Tue Nov 20 15:09:03 2007 >>> Subject: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 >>> >>> Folks - >>> >>> We have 2.5 hrs in Vancouver (Friday morning). Based on our >>> chartered >>> work, list discussions, and agenda requests, here's the agenda I'm >>> planning to follow: >>> >>> 15m Administrivia Chairs >>> 30m http-location-delivery Mary (<- Lets finish this one!) >>> 20m Finishing geopriv-policy Hannes/Cullen >>> 30m LIS Discovery James W >>> 10m l7lcp-ps Hannes >>> 20m pidf-lo-dynamic Henning >>> 15m dhcp-lbyr-uri-option James P >>> 10m civicaddresses-austria Karl >>> 20m Uncertainty and Confidence James W >>> 10m HELD Dereference James W >>> >>> As usual, we have many other requests to talk about other things - >>> please take those to the list for now. >>> >>> This is a draft agenda and we can change it. Let me know if you >>> think >>> I've missed something important. >>> >>> RjS >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Geopriv mailing list >>> Geopriv@ietf.org >> >> <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>https:// >> www1.ietf.org/m > ai >> lman/listinfo/geopriv >>> >>> ***** >>> >>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or >>> entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, >>> proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, >>> dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance >>> upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended >>> recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please >>> contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. GA623 >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- > -- >> ----------------------- >>> This message is for the designated recipient only and may >>> contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. >>> If you have received it in error, please notify the sender >>> immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of >>> this email is prohibited. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- > -- >> ----------------------- >>> [mf2] >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Geopriv mailing list >>> Geopriv@ietf.org >>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------- > This message is for the designated recipient only and may > contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. > If you have received it in error, please notify the sender > immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of > this email is prohibited. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------- > [mf2] > _______________________________________________ Geopriv mailing list Geopriv@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
- Re: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Stark, Barbara
- [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Robert Sparks
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Marc Linsner
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Winterbottom, James
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 g.caron
- Re: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 James M. Polk
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Winterbottom, James
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 James M. Polk
- Please us an appropriate subject line : Re: [Geop… Robert Sparks
- [Geopriv] In response to.. Winterbottom, James
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Marc Linsner
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Marc Linsner
- Re: [Geopriv] In response to.. Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: [Geopriv] In response to.. Winterbottom, James
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] In response to.. James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] In response to.. James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 James M. Polk
- RE: [Geopriv] HELD identity extension - standardi… Dawson, Martin
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Winterbottom, James
- RE: [Geopriv] HELD bindings and relevance to iden… Dawson, Martin
- [Geopriv] Message Flow Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] Message Flow Salvatore Loreto
- [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Winterbottom, James
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Brian Rosen
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Brian Rosen
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Dawson, Martin
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Geopriv] Message Flow Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Brian Rosen
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Brian Rosen
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Brian Rosen
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Brian Rosen
- Re: [Geopriv] Message Flow Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Winterbottom, James
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Brian Rosen
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Geopriv] Message Flow Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Brian Rosen
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Geopriv] Message Flow Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Marc Berryman
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Marc Linsner
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Dawson, Martin
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Dawson, Martin
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Dawson, Martin
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Marc Berryman
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Marc Linsner
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 john.medland
- [Geopriv] HELD IDs in extension vs. URI Stark, Barbara
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 James M. Polk
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow Winterbottom, James
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Winterbottom, James
- [Geopriv] Religious Terminology Discussions Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Thomson, Martin
- RE: [Geopriv] draft agenda: GEOPRIV @ IETF 70 Dawson, Martin
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Dawson, Martin
- [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance and Content Ind… James M. Polk
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Marc Linsner
- RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again Dawson, Martin
- [Geopriv] RE: SIP Conveyance vs Retrieval James M. Polk
- [Geopriv] RE: SIP Conveyance vs Retrieval Dawson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Religious Terminology Discussions Carl Reed OGC Account
- OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Marc Linsner
- Re: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Marc Linsner
- Re: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Brian Rosen
- Re: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Marc Linsner
- Re: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Brian Rosen
- Re: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Hannes Tschofenig
- [Geopriv] RE: OBO Marc Linsner
- [Geopriv] RE: OBO Brian Rosen
- RE: [Geopriv] RE: OBO Stark, Barbara
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Brian Rosen
- RE: [Geopriv] RE: OBO Marc Linsner
- RE: [Geopriv] Religious Terminology Discussions Roger Marshall
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Dawson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Religious Terminology Discussions Carl Reed OGC Account
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Tatham Oddie
- RE: [Geopriv] RE: OBO Dawson, Martin
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Dawson, Martin
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Brian Rosen
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Dawson, Martin
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Marc Linsner
- RE: [Geopriv] Religious Terminology Discussions Roger Marshall
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Winterbottom, James
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Marc Linsner
- Re: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Robert Sparks
- RE: OBO (was - RE: [Geopriv] Message Flow, again) Marc Linsner
- [Geopriv] http-location-delivery Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: [Geopriv] http-location-delivery Winterbottom, James