Re: [homegate] [fun] HOMENET working group proposal

Mikael Abrahamsson <> Fri, 01 July 2011 05:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB1F11E80D6; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7u2zNg8YKBsP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C96811E80D0; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by (Postfix, from userid 501) id 17F989C; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:23:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D569A; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:23:47 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:23:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <>
To: Martin Focazio <>
In-Reply-To: <-4529087406481929693@unknownmsgid>
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <-4529087406481929693@unknownmsgid>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [homegate] [fun] HOMENET working group proposal
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Broadband Home Gateway Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 05:23:51 -0000

On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, Martin Focazio wrote:

> You assume at Alice CAN select a service provider. In a large part of
> the USA your choices are nil. You have a single wireline provider or
> you don't have a connection.

I don't see why the IETF should spend time on IPv4 because of some 
political problem in certain countries which makes the market not work 

IPv4 is legacy, IPv6 is where the development effort should be, when IPv6 
offers more functionality then things will most likely sort themselves 

Personally I believe video conferencing is the killer app. I have problems 
getting video calls to work when both are behind NAT, it works just fine 
with one person being behind NAT (and the other one not having firewall 
configured so it's stopping the traffic). With IPv6 we just need to sort 
out the firewall problem. My mom is very impressed by being able to 
videocall her grandchild and follow his development, and if I told her 
it'd cost 200 USD extra to make it work (better), either she or I would 
spend the money.

Mikael Abrahamsson    email: