Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) for HOMEGATE

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 09 September 2010 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homegate@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homegate@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8093A6914 for <homegate@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UqDDqda7YmHR for <homegate@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C410F3A68D2 for <homegate@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so1641774bwz.31 for <homegate@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=D11jI7TVVwb1IbZJeZ66tyhDfHkbRnljBOZDLSdCqOs=; b=Yqvv4O2lTIPFLNgmnJ0P1qsM0cKgy1xcANP1pqsI4EiDxrb9jjO4kXYa2ExwkBFxQ9 PJ2XGqVzYvNeJFGlIerK0a1J6IgPdpaxFtkdddFmU0nLOTo02N1tDcNgwcCczHz0PWkK ZbQToZholghYQSswMu0jmWnhA/JxwTU1S3tVg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=ObwgwrMG4we8WB6LU87aIhXMwkrWMw7hxV8s8qxDVNqeIrVOAtrF18syUFCAg42vZB ilIpvu3Nu/147glqYmtFxfIHoRppJiCDK0G0VZdWY5YI4NKAS0iM1PU0Izuk9Yrn1JC/ +J6U9iKea93T3sxGr49rpDb41LFPa9KBC6C2Y=
Received: by 10.204.127.10 with SMTP id e10mr1217235bks.136.1284048339489; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.186] ([212.147.27.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x19sm1179318bkv.21.2010.09.09.09.05.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1C2AE6C5-0D51-42D7-BE20-227C97190840@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:55:33 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F4E5CBE0-EA67-4E26-823A-06C95452E44A@gmail.com>
References: <CC1E998F-8828-4E29-9DBF-CFF98CF029E0@nominet.org.uk> <4C88C7FE.5000403@broadcom.com> <750BF7861EBBE048B3E648B4BB6E8F4F160B56F3@crexc50p> <84B9FD86-80F8-47F3-BB59-F9C410C78F5A@gmail.com> <1C2AE6C5-0D51-42D7-BE20-227C97190840@cisco.com>
To: Mark Baugher <mbaugher@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Cc: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>, homegate@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) for HOMEGATE
X-BeenThere: homegate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Broadband Home Gateway Discussion <homegate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homegate>
List-Post: <mailto:homegate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:05:14 -0000

802.15.4 is not bridgeable to other common home network technologies, so a router will be required to connect an 802.15.4 subnet into a home/premises/office network.

- Ralph

On Sep 9, 2010, at 4:41 PM 9/9/10, Mark Baugher wrote:

> Ralph, I don't see why 802.15.4 is a specific motivator for developing home routing. Would you explain that?
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Sep 9, 2010, at 7:12 AM, Ralph Droms wrote:
> 
>> I think it's important to mention 802.15.4 explicitly, as that technology is a specific motivator for the use of routing rather than bridging in the home/premises/office network...
>> 
>> - Ralph 
>> 
>> On Sep 9, 2010, at 3:42 PM 9/9/10, STARK, BARBARA H (ATTLABS) wrote:
>> 
>>>>> A home network can include a variety of data-link technologies, be
>>> it
>>>>> Ethernet, 802.11, 802.15.4 or power line communication.
>>>> 
>>>> Please add "MoCA" (over coax) to the list.
>>> 
>>> <sigh> Unless you want to add everyone's favorite physical layer
>>> technology, you may want to "genericize" all but the 2 most prevalent
>>> (Ethernet and 802.11). For example: "... Ethernet, 802.11, over coax,
>>> over power line, over phone line, or other wireless communication
>>> technologies."
>>> 
>>> Barbara
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> homegate mailing list
>>> homegate@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> homegate mailing list
>> homegate@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate
>