Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) for HOMEGATE
"Stephen [kiwin] PALM" <palm@broadcom.com> Thu, 09 September 2010 16:55 UTC
Return-Path: <palm@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: homegate@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homegate@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615AD3A68D6 for <homegate@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.529
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.070, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N0n2NS1uy2MA for <homegate@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mms2.broadcom.com (mms2.broadcom.com [216.31.210.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275F43A6870 for <homegate@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.9.200.131] by mms2.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.3.2)); Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:55:29 -0700
X-Server-Uuid: D3C04415-6FA8-4F2C-93C1-920E106A2031
Received: from mail-irva-12.broadcom.com (10.11.16.101) by IRVEXCHHUB01.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.9.200.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.247.2; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:55:29 -0700
Received: from [10.9.253.30] (dhcp-10-9-253-30.broadcom.com [10.9.253.30]) by mail-irva-12.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E5069CA9; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C89117E.8040005@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:55:26 -0700
From: "Stephen [kiwin] PALM" <palm@broadcom.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
References: <CC1E998F-8828-4E29-9DBF-CFF98CF029E0@nominet.org.uk> <4C88C7FE.5000403@broadcom.com> <4C88F0B0.4070002@cisco.com> <4C88F2EB.1000208@broadcom.com> <4C890B29.3060600@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C890B29.3060600@cisco.com>
X-WSS-ID: 6097CE0B3ES9964482-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "homegate@ietf.org" <homegate@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) for HOMEGATE
X-BeenThere: homegate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Broadband Home Gateway Discussion <homegate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homegate>
List-Post: <mailto:homegate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:55:27 -0000
On 9/9/2010 9:28 AM, Mark Townsley wrote: > I think the idea was simply to show diversity, not a popularity contest > by any means. If you think we need MoCA, it's fine with me. Side > questin: Are there any aspects of it that make it difficult to bridge to > other media types (similar to the zigbee requirement that Ralph is > pointing to)? Fortunately there are no difficulties with MoCA. MoCA-Ethernet bridges, for example, have been around for years. > But, is there anything specific that homegate would need to do be sure > IP operates through a bridge? Perhaps you are you thinking of QoS here? Yes and other issues caused by differences in throughput, latency and error-rate. Flow control comes to mind. regards, kiwin -- Stephen [kiwin] Palm Ph.D. E: palm@kiwin.com Senior Technical Director T: +1-949-926-PALM Broadcom Broadband Communications Group F: +1-949-926-7256 Irvine, California W: http://www.kiwin.com Secondary email accounts: stephenpalm@alumni.uci.edu palm@broadcom.com s.palm@ieee.org palm@itu.ch spalm@cs.cmu.edu palm@ics.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Marco Davids (SIDN)
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Kirksey, Heather R (Heather)
- [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) for … Ray Bellis
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Marco Davids (SIDN)
- [homegate] Fwd: A new proposed charter (and name)… Ray Bellis
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Paul Hoffman
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Mark Townsley
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Stephen [kiwin] PALM
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Stephen [kiwin] PALM
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Stephen [kiwin] PALM
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Mark Townsley
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … STARK, BARBARA H (ATTLABS)
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Ralph Droms
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Mark Townsley
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Mark Townsley
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Mark Baugher
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Ralph Droms
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Mark Townsley
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Stephen [kiwin] PALM
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … STARK, BARBARA H (ATTLABS)
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Ole Troan
- Re: [homegate] A new proposed charter (and name) … Mark Baugher