Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 30 June 2011 03:21 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: homegate@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homegate@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E0011E80C1; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Hdyl+I-CThn; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D3C11E8083; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C0121172; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:21:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:21:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=smtpout; bh=CMm5QgOwpRKcotVtmrAMByvzWDA=; b=UyUyAgNcUOe/x76GjQz5mpBqaSdptXHqOrxFIB9jv641W6PtB2xiXCiJiMpFlpHWa9nnPXLLRpDwXxotLphG0pUf+DcfkQBbVvUrPAjO8iNZXdO5NlV0O2KCMYFYyBLmoDXTykrhTttjbI3OMs5NrRCZMROiyMVv7ZFYggSUCNc=
X-Sasl-enc: mKFHnhiEt5T2IaClvw26X3FD5SBl2rX9hv0DW/p/w6HV 1309404070
Received: from host65-16-145-177.birch.net (host65-16-145-177.birch.net [65.16.145.177]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 677DB400F0A; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:21:09 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-90-384369889
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinuPcq2r85kzMctFCHDB3Ta=WgA4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:20:51 -0400
Message-Id: <3C67E327-1147-46A6-92C5-C52851BC1BC0@network-heretics.com>
References: <4E0AE696.4020603@piuha.net> <4E0BDCF3.1090003@gont.com.ar> <BANLkTinuPcq2r85kzMctFCHDB3Ta=WgA4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:39:36 -0700
Cc: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, "homegate@ietf.org" <homegate@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
X-BeenThere: homegate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Broadband Home Gateway Discussion <homegate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homegate>
List-Post: <mailto:homegate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:21:13 -0000

On Jun 29, 2011, at 10:38 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> The utility of network based spi firewalls is debatable. Likely a never ending debate.
> 

+1