Re: [homenet] support for HNCP in IPv6 CE routers

["STARK, BARBARA H" <[e-mail]>]

As chair...
I think it would be useful for homenet to discuss how to propagate its protocols into general purpose home network routers (that people may use at the edge or interior) and also what may or may not be good to include in requirements specifically targeting routers at the customer's edge (CE). 

Jordi: if you would like to bravely volunteer to help guide this discussion by being the person at the presenter microphone, that would be great. We could base discussion on the 7084-bis draft so you don't need to have another draft; but maybe some slides focused on the specific homenet questions. 

If others in homenet think having this discussion is a bad idea please let me/us know. 
Barbara

> On Oct 24, 2017, at 1:07 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi James,
> 
> I included HNCP in RFC7084-bis following your request :-(
> 
> So even if I’d only a couple of answers, I think it we are on the right track …
> 
> So, concentrating in homenet.
> 
> Do, repeating my 2nd questions, do we believe we need a specific document HOMENET document to suggest to include in CE, or to say how to do it, or whatever?
> 
> Maybe it is interesting, if the chairs agree, to include this question in the WG agenda for the next meeting?
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: homenet <[e-mail]> en nombre de james woodyatt <[e-mail]>
> Responder a: <[e-mail]>
> Fecha: lunes, 23 de octubre de 2017, 22:12
> Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[e-mail]>, HOMENET <[e-mail]>
> Asunto: Re: [homenet] support for HNCP in IPv6 CE routers
> 
>    On Oct 23, 2017, at 00:48, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
>    Now, in this version I’ve NOT included the HNCP support as a requirement, however I still mention it as:
> 
>    The end-user network is a stub network, in the sense that is not
>       providing transit to other external networks.  However, HNCP
>       ([RFC7788]) allows support for automatic provisioning of downstream
>       routers.  Figure 1 illustrates the model topology for the end-user
>       network.
> 
>    Now, the questions I’ve for this WG is:
> 
>    1) Do you think I should mention other homenet documents ?
>    2) Do you think we should have a specific homenet document requiring the support of homenet for IPv6 CE routers, so for example this becomes an integral part of testing by ISPs, IPv6 Ready Logo, or even RFQs, etc.?
> 
>    I will be happy to work in a homenet document if we believe that 2 above is needed. Anyone else interested?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    I think it would be better if you leave aside all mention of HOMENET protocols from the RFC 7084-bis draft. That document is mainly intended for first-mile internet service providers, and I think the less the have to say about how residential networks operate behind the demarcation point at the edge of their networks, the better for everyone. This would give HOMENET optimal freedom to write standards for interoperability of devices intended for home networks without having to get mired in the tar pit of dealing with first-mile internet service provider stuff.
> 
> 
>    --james woodyatt <[e-mail]>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    homenet mailing list
>    [e-mail]
>    https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_homenet&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=LoGzhC-8sc8SY8Tq4vrfog&m=_bR9FvzwQbxh-O6P0rZaAVc0qP9N51NHDxBJbsA_U3g&s=WZA2wxLl7avD8GFCF7eXUzLwkfVvFzOxKZFGPXPtYDE&e= 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.consulintel.es&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=LoGzhC-8sc8SY8Tq4vrfog&m=_bR9FvzwQbxh-O6P0rZaAVc0qP9N51NHDxBJbsA_U3g&s=HKL3FbaYGYEKqIpNRC_7FRP4YfGsmyViXh2wV5zCEw8&e= 
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_homenet&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=LoGzhC-8sc8SY8Tq4vrfog&m=_bR9FvzwQbxh-O6P0rZaAVc0qP9N51NHDxBJbsA_U3g&s=WZA2wxLl7avD8GFCF7eXUzLwkfVvFzOxKZFGPXPtYDE&e=