Re: [homenet] naming drafts

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 08 June 2021 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44EF93A368C for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 09:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zHas23EW3YcJ for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 09:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C1613A368A for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 09:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A4F38CDF; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:54:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DProcO4aelQO; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:54:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4244F38CDE; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:54:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C771675B; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:54:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>, "'homenet@ietf.org'" <homenet@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <877dj4sd3w.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <DM6PR02MB692445CDCA3FD587D20404A2C33B9@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <17049.1622918776@localhost> <87eedg9ker.wl-jch@irif.fr> <14386.1623092595@localhost> <877dj4sd3w.wl-jch@irif.fr>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 12:54:03 -0400
Message-ID: <32727.1623171243@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/U5nES3ouwVVWeKdSuGlSB7qDAAI>
Subject: Re: [homenet] naming drafts
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:54:16 -0000

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
    > Michael, it would probably take you 20 minutes to write up an I-D
    > describing a reasonable REST-based DDNS protocol, another 5 minutes to
    > write a client implementation in Javascript, and one hour to write
    > a robust server that is well integrated with Bind.

Yes, I did that.  It's in front of you.
As you said, there are three different specifications: why didn't you pick one?

We went back and forth multiple times as to REST vs AXFR from the HNA.
The feedback *FROM DNS OPERATORS* (which you aren't) was that they preferred AXFR.

    >> If the device renumbers, or experiences a flash renumbering, how does it
    >> know to re-register?

    > All of these are interesting issues.  However, I don't see how they depend
    > on whether the update is carried over HTTPS or AXFR.

It sure does, because DDNS as described by you is done by the end-device,
which can't see the IPv4 renumber, which btw, is all those devices support.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide