Re: [http-auth] RFC5987bis, was: WGLC on the MutualAuth drafts

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 11 July 2016 05:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D25512B016 for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6JV2nfjFlzMS for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1299312B00D for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id i5so1510935wmg.0 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+Nt9sZlYtzzhH7ObJ4np+WzVbC7O8Mbm/E2dWLUidj0=; b=IJi7+nfJlb4Pqd3gZkcE/o+2WeOqmViYUX9nReogCxGqVXcP/wAJAnPRQwxoKZJzk6 2066F+ZBnaw/GqeWcE4dD3uPeYrVQRzWOFhLfvw+QSIs25M3/NI3goL7AGjxt8BFHrSb PMUyno5I3vWGs9n0VexQvDxSoFMjuYJAfBtvH2DPiwFko1S9K1vco1E4kU3mjUdZj/nX UR0jFF+tDRNooPZtzv9cJFLK+wb1ZIM/3Op5fRgGyBsfdhxxje2s6IINrJE09FuKCV1w X9HgWU/2vpkNwk6bqUFhFek+AVlERdZd8JE25OWteNUFqyYNCzubaHaX8pkYXMhu8egD McKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+Nt9sZlYtzzhH7ObJ4np+WzVbC7O8Mbm/E2dWLUidj0=; b=iSt0jUCl9FGhXb4WqqPB8XsYBEfbQVgqW5rOXrt/yNLuq8YMXnPpGTBBqjq3IdnK3D PBpY0HPGjgo7iZh8XrbjI0VXZHJUMcDufRxQEGMHiMbD8y5nRKOhwVWYkMLfptyy5P84 soj3IgB+Y3NtRsPeTKWCFbx+Dt7lOkRFHkRLmZxyLuunNw0PlSmktfATYsLiTlWcSYKX 4FNx2j3G2whoS1U6u3E3BlqF+hEmg6PujyjNKhDBOCyj068G0oyGtBWgXgIPUMue0Jr/ BoaV0xwcPbkyMTB+Z1LHJJKF8lb/09uJ/geuYPMy8XeUu4YOsu8Q1K0Uw+0GuPYjyJbz mNQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLgqgk9Z6zt7h6hOtTYG6wtZb6LuR3819wYgMZi8+QSYA3ZT1f1Vay6Ka3fs1KIag==
X-Received: by 10.28.131.200 with SMTP id f191mr16927271wmd.80.1468216450573; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from the-mbp-of-yoav.mshome.net ([176.13.240.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 207sm15154555wmb.7.2016.07.10.22.54.08 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <77f07eac-2a52-17e4-38f6-e1d4aac4c7af@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:54:05 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8CF0FBC6-3417-4CAE-993D-07E9CA1A912E@gmail.com>
References: <2DBE893A-434D-4B67-BF12-AEFBDE7A23B7@gmail.com> <32b9df1f-b61d-405e-d935-5d964d9acbb6@gmx.de> <77f07eac-2a52-17e4-38f6-e1d4aac4c7af@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/k0yQf_H27kCB0XqXxAhUYa3Tgyw>
Cc: httpauth mailing list <http-auth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-auth] RFC5987bis, was: WGLC on the MutualAuth drafts
X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP authentication methods <http-auth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/http-auth/>
List-Post: <mailto:http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:54:13 -0000

> On 9 Jul 2016, at 1:34 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> On 2016-06-18 11:59, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> ...
>> 4.  Authentication-Control header
>> 
>>    Authentication-Control = 1#Auth-Control-Entry
>>    Auth-Control-Entry     = auth-scheme 1*SP 1#auth-control-param
>>    auth-control-param     = extensive-token BWS "=" BWS token
>>                           / extensive-token "*" BWS "=" BWS ext-value
>>    ext-value              = <see RFC 5987, Section 3.2>
>> 
>>      Figure 4: the BNF syntax for the Authentication-Control header
>> 
>> FYI: I'm in the process of revising RFC 5987, and that ABNF production
>> is going to be removed. Seems we need to coordinate here.
>> ...
> 
> Sorry for causing confusion.
> 
> Since I wrote this I went back to RFC 5987bis, and it turns out that the ABNF production I intended to kill is *ext-parameter*, not *ext-value*.
> 
> See change in <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-02.txt#part-4> (just submitted).

OK, and comparing RFC 5987 and rfc5987bis I see that the definition of ext-value is the same. 

So does that mean we’re good to go on these drafts?

Yoav