IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr

Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com> Sun, 10 February 2013 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B1F21F8777 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:58:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.826
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.826 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k0ycQzD2EgRx for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:58:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7FC21F86DA for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:58:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U4etb-0001TK-Gx for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 21:57:11 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 21:57:11 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U4etb-0001TK-Gx@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mike@belshe.com>) id 1U4etV-0001SV-33 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 21:57:05 +0000
Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mike@belshe.com>) id 1U4etU-0003iW-Cw for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 21:57:05 +0000
Received: by mail-bk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id jm19so2403875bkc.30 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:56:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=HnHkVzQVgCzEnG8lj1R77AucHxmhHKWV3G1A1AvBjrg=; b=hVuyuI/SAdsWYbuaM0SiVsHCvdFftp5cOX+ANM8zT5McS+UxejykQPj8BLW1ZcTpAy 2ITyQg3TtCgI0n/xL0JHEshXlfIouOfrxTPWFCl4/lyHFD1IzM9IOSs3lWfx9dZkVKbj h+XoPkNMcURyrImw90oTi0Z76483QcfzHsNVkZuAcbK4eXXHAhIfjxlEpYsPUf4aZpMz MWbMtMWqSzZqrtivDZRHhrzwSWPEajUsmCjecugDh/nu67CY3XWNeLNU/gu0MJUiBGkL 0j9TMYKHaprqtuv71/TYl0I49PYcyQPGIqeOmiDk2/JZt4jb5nWHY1qehjegxY/vulf/ 1pRg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.204.145.195 with SMTP id e3mr3523423bkv.27.1360533397446; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.148.135 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:56:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5110CB17.2000200@cisco.com>
References: <5110CB17.2000200@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:56:37 -0800
Message-ID: <CABaLYCuKuei2jOKpFtcQ8Y+7oPrhfibn3HN1rqGqRkUGt1H5Bg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0015175cb470dc208404d565dd1e"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk4YKjfRmQeSP9tiA2Rh6oTPwWH2b6UAezfesR0fLfBOk2eRfAJeMqE5qjhfD9wdlcdyZpG
Received-SPF: none client-ip=209.85.214.43; envelope-from=mike@belshe.com; helo=mail-bk0-f43.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.151, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1U4etU-0003iW-Cw da0a1371b1dd1609992c6eeacb7ee3a5
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABaLYCuKuei2jOKpFtcQ8Y+7oPrhfibn3HN1rqGqRkUGt1H5Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16528
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I am sorry if this sounds too negative.

But personally, I don't think this proposal is a good avenue to take at
all.  Further, I don't believe there will be any significant
implementations of it.  I heard similar comments from others offline, but
I'll let them speak up here.

I would propose:
   a) Find out if there is really any support for this approach from
implementors
   b) If so, have at it!
   c) If not, let's table it and move on

Mike



On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> At the interim meeting we discussed this draft in several different
> contexts.  Here is my understanding of what people would like to see,
> going forward:
>
> 1.  Change the InstanceId to be something mnemonic instead of a number,
> so that services can have names.
> 2.  Combine transport protocol and version information into a profile
> 3.  Add a text field that can provide browser hints.
>
> I have no issues with the first two.  There were two examples given for
> the 3rd: browser hints and BDP.  I think we decided that BDP wouldn't
> work well, so do people agree that browser hints are appropriate for
> DNS?  If so, what's a good example?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eliot
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email