IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Tue, 05 February 2013 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E394A21F88ED for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:35:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.158, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k5LvHDxR9vfL for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:35:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AC221F88E6 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:35:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U2qA4-0007EG-G6 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:34:40 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:34:40 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U2qA4-0007EG-G6@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1U2q9y-0007Ba-SZ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:34:34 +0000
Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1U2q9y-0005Vf-7z for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:34:34 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 10so923870ied.16 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:34:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=9KZwXC4Vspnd75bGHmCF2nbGx+2BRJWWYHDOdGimZU8=; b=thcLC++PGiuPhaHHCgj+6KZ79JCwJ/LYED4je+uWgEeyf8J9NLKNTgn49quQOJsmUk CCu0Kx9VzVO+/zzf4bb2wp+FTBeEcvhX4+S5CQo7MpzL63CsegBkIWUTHMTFA595SUFr 2q/wIzIBYaS2R8CTyU0HbBXmHD5ED1BWnaBfA5sYomx26F3IJ95+eDr5ugBNsuD2toRy bZhyK6qOHHow0apqa6eLt7D87uaNzL35f1DKqCCHZDsIZVAzuylnnhdZAmQ1CZYi77Ps mQTDCIpMrKmQnhk9GW+bc/eT83pg3IOcUCQYU56wYEzLbD8fTo3GomDH2sTmYR3Lkp4H 7RCA==
X-Received: by 10.42.58.202 with SMTP id j10mr24215529ich.39.1360100048315; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:34:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.53.237 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:33:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAP+FsNcxifHmO3ne4v_bfv6L8_jrdUCv5xstLX9tAnF5Pi9cHw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5110CB17.2000200@cisco.com> <CAP+FsNcapugpzHzuCkTmwV3C4fB=K0H3Svdoqwxqt8dNHocn8g@mail.gmail.com> <51117618.2060601@cisco.com> <CAP+FsNcxifHmO3ne4v_bfv6L8_jrdUCv5xstLX9tAnF5Pi9cHw@mail.gmail.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:33:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CABP7Rbc2xuS8CWnNHmBrgdW6pSnbUcna9uRXHGbUQ0PXK842dQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf303346133d263704d500f82c"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.223.171; envelope-from=jasnell@gmail.com; helo=mail-ie0-f171.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.710, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1U2q9y-0005Vf-7z e5f9197f013ee7d604b22cf896fa88cd
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABP7Rbc2xuS8CWnNHmBrgdW6pSnbUcna9uRXHGbUQ0PXK842dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16388
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I suspect that several of the settings (compression state, flow control,
etc) are simply going to be too dynamic for us to rely on DNS.


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:

> It will in certain use-cases, e.g. restarting a browser with many open
> tabs, using a webapp or native application accessing a remote site, or when
> a service is experiencing heavy load (it may decrease the max compression
> state size), etc.
> -=R
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2/5/13 10:06 PM, Roberto Peon wrote:
>>
>> I don't remember BDP being one of these, though we did have discussion
>> that talked about BDP in relation to some of the settings.
>> These were more along the lines of max-concurrent-streams,
>> max-compressor-state-size, and various other HTTP/2 specific settings that
>> the client should know about/respect.
>>
>>
>> Ok, next question: given that we're mandating a settings frame as part of
>> connection initialization (at least I think we agreed on that), does
>> putting this stuff in DNS save anything?
>>
>> Eliot
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email