IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr

Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> Tue, 05 February 2013 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870B921F8B36 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:07:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.091, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6hyMpfIUkT6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:07:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF0521F8A50 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:07:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U2pj7-0002Aj-It for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:06:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:06:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U2pj7-0002Aj-It@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1U2pj1-00029u-Ja for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:06:43 +0000
Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1U2pj0-0007qA-LA for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:06:43 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id fs13so658254lab.22 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:06:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DCmsNbxE5wH/kqD0KSHKKtg1RwAVqDtX+sE+HbbwA7o=; b=XfE7xhmgkj+MTYoGKbQ/Cjf0ndZ8SuP1Ks1T1tRCIfP2h9dD9qrRvYP9JgOtJTFvoo Lazn+lESg9/lkKXt3cKYezjiXbSGq6Jva1h+UDyOiuHr0yaMz59AGy0eaxHp1QZSFyeG TVFqKMSNb9i1f2S+f8r7ZWBLr3ctqjBsP5WtCimvsHH7CQx7DPdsUA7QHieMmdyTjZyf Ccx9V/XwlWXfvvhzMWz0M++z4d8B88NX2RXMaw0Cr3C24NmKeKNBuevY/xZWKYoRbSxg oDAZ6n4FBbrCkULOLD+jMrWspIf6P+5KVqe9qCTvyIJWQrkgBLexV/Mzrj/Oi/rgCbjW 7WQg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.147.202 with SMTP id tm10mr24635245lab.56.1360098375544; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:06:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.81.5 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:06:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5110CB17.2000200@cisco.com>
References: <5110CB17.2000200@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:06:15 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNcapugpzHzuCkTmwV3C4fB=K0H3Svdoqwxqt8dNHocn8g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f23531188aed004d5009497"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.49; envelope-from=grmocg@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f49.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.654, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1U2pj0-0007qA-LA f2e441ebbc6d16d6a4c2325b93acaacf
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAP+FsNcapugpzHzuCkTmwV3C4fB=K0H3Svdoqwxqt8dNHocn8g@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16382
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I don't remember BDP being one of these, though we did have discussion that
talked about BDP in relation to some of the settings.
These were more along the lines of max-concurrent-streams,
max-compressor-state-size, and various other HTTP/2 specific settings that
the client should know about/respect.

-=R


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> At the interim meeting we discussed this draft in several different
> contexts.  Here is my understanding of what people would like to see,
> going forward:
>
> 1.  Change the InstanceId to be something mnemonic instead of a number,
> so that services can have names.
> 2.  Combine transport protocol and version information into a profile
> 3.  Add a text field that can provide browser hints.
>
> I have no issues with the first two.  There were two examples given for
> the 3rd: browser hints and BDP.  I think we decided that BDP wouldn't
> work well, so do people agree that browser hints are appropriate for
> DNS?  If so, what's a good example?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eliot
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email