IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Op-sec simplification

Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> Mon, 31 October 2016 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455BB129AE0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wxQf6tVDeZVY for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44246129AE2 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c1IlS-0000CC-FP for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:01:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:01:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c1IlS-0000CC-FP@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1c1IlL-0000BN-ET for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:00:55 +0000
Received: from mail-dm3nam03on0119.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.41.119] helo=NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1c1IlF-00023z-9C for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:00:50 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=H18lxZfC6zJLckLPTogk6wu00Jy0SqBvn3iSBGfCWgY=; b=ZGZZijHC8Rg4sskrvHhPkMKbgcuW+kETAd7Vm82FFJgVMAMmcQK4jtfosaSVV6f7Xer+LH8uw7NNO9leizs8wr4D9SCDm/NUJNlDa0fu9ox8LivWOL0BqmuL+DvAttB5AnJSUQuFUL8I914wLP92efLIwpi5cmO3GxIDv1pXlig=
Received: from BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.173.144.15) by BN6PR03MB2706.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.173.144.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.693.12; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:00:20 +0000
Received: from BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.144.15]) by BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.144.15]) with mapi id 15.01.0679.020; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:00:20 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
CC: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: Op-sec simplification
Thread-Index: AQHSMzgxU/1c8rIat0qK8dwR+i9dY6DCVBEAgACoNWA=
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:00:20 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR03MB27084FE886DD2E6A4857A47D87AE0@BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20161031053239.E9C6D12F5D@welho-filter3.welho.com> <CABkgnnXMdXBcJU+t_cF1n9MRApSd5wfiWjMKEqO+wwkVp43BJw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXMdXBcJU+t_cF1n9MRApSd5wfiWjMKEqO+wwkVp43BJw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:b::390]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 11261070-f758-45ee-11af-08d401c88b4d
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR03MB2706; 7:Pc7JBLZ1vTlse7tT7ZqTQ2C3bE5OraO5jdEaXp/7nDltF3dRkdsMg9fhLUnOxOylWpf33SRXHy+k0bu3T0blFsSC7KW8kiG7MJ3kiCqYwRFtv4F9p17Jg4yNOSDKsor0VMeqVP/s7aVZc4pBxNfv4utSoGODXiAaA9gKmL3H8r5ih+UuQsqkw/97anomF24bUOxT2wp92CZagSDRjKBJwwPdM6P7cu4wiIWdIeY9+2Y1H9a2dw0A62W7du2yL4yRUq2n7z6jF+XX4CFLqRMfEKG8QpIA9yfUA9cTnxmz8nhdP5osHoVHF7GuleIK2+zQ7c431YdIdeudglRqYgB8X4ouIBh6/Fkkd7rhxIdlutdANxgQqCptvIIYceJdb7wO
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN6PR03MB2706;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR03MB2706D747F5F9DA35596DBF9387AE0@BN6PR03MB2706.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863)(79290750141951);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040176)(6045074)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6046074)(6072074); SRVR:BN6PR03MB2706; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN6PR03MB2706;
x-forefront-prvs: 01128BA907
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(24454002)(13464003)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(189998001)(76176999)(54356999)(15975445007)(50986999)(106116001)(77096005)(76576001)(33656002)(101416001)(86362001)(99286002)(105586002)(2900100001)(106356001)(11100500001)(86612001)(5660300001)(4326007)(15974865002)(9686002)(2906002)(8936002)(2950100002)(74316002)(305945005)(3480700004)(7736002)(7846002)(97736004)(5001770100001)(5002640100001)(68736007)(8990500004)(92566002)(102836003)(10090500001)(5005710100001)(10400500002)(10290500002)(87936001)(3660700001)(6116002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(586003)(122556002)(81166006)(81156014)(7696004)(3280700002)(8676002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR03MB2706; H:BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Oct 2016 20:00:20.5771 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR03MB2706
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=104.47.41.119; envelope-from=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com; helo=NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.451, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_NW=0.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1c1IlF-00023z-9C 350cf69db513a4b3d4b4578c10c47682
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Op-sec simplification
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/BN6PR03MB27084FE886DD2E6A4857A47D87AE0@BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32760
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I like the direction this is moving, yes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 2:58 AM
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Op-sec simplification

On 31 October 2016 at 16:32, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:
> Hmm. Reading it from original and from the secured server gives little 
> more verify that they really are giving same answers.

Yes, but as I observed, we're never truly certain; there's always a pathological case where a client can be convinced of the server being right when it is in fact wrong.  Asking both sides only adds to the complexity of the solution.

> | GET http://www.example.com/.well-known/http-opportunistic HTTP/1.1
> | Host: www.example.com

Yes, thanks for pointing that out.  Fixed.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email