Re: Op-sec simplification

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 31 October 2016 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BCB12962E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 03:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dI2eNWbsI9_J for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 03:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9856129645 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 03:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c19MS-0005BO-1I for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:58:36 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:58:36 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c19MS-0005BO-1I@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1c19MK-0005A1-NC for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:58:28 +0000
Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1c19ME-0004sG-On for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:58:23 +0000
Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id v138so64699144qka.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6rGgC0tuXQq7Tc/osuXW1x++3gSsZflMQdJDAKw5kQ4=; b=GEwm4X9Em0Ps7CivOlAzgcAKR/b1YZSfy0bxepS8oZOd/nXAPX7nOu2R+4K3v9jd9N 57PQP3wn/mEXujp28zwCFlHrl3YUv7tGb8fFMTmjrWjDkHMmO7w3iXf8Pl7zHWOdBBa7 +j3cRs/gLMXIJZFxAcRIv7Mpj1ELaGLQU2hA/58doDF/9nzk68GqXToaTaP9ZbBstvWl boM8k6x/3J+Ta8TLJBobOkMa8M3iFLitLGofqgvCe4ziQwkh8ooapVyvNJEHffcHVq6F 2jF2rPDlowQeLnjv2pp0l0oJP2VKhZg0YVj3HE9TxlL9BXluzsHWV3hTKWAyE1Xj3ZWv 0pNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6rGgC0tuXQq7Tc/osuXW1x++3gSsZflMQdJDAKw5kQ4=; b=ZM7+wXX0fP5ADfKsKL9jD+ymhij5qhE6G5+vK/LVsR0w2HaJZqsTDw2oJgU6D4pado n3Do0A5JmoGSFkxTkKbaCgg1THWXp9d8ainJCk+/ykm9pP8fRceM3bsr/6emwYrQEc1+ Srkgsj52DramUXMEX8rNUAN3j4FWpCS7H2FcPs457VkWayWMh+tXP1jpo2MvvifnL3QK CRN853QghyY5gab1No8jYayVc32L5M1TdGVU3m5B9TflgUfHcODxGyyY6nrpsUCLZEl7 HSsdOw5gqfIqX7hmvXlVTRTTdhtafU37cDbdP4BEPDIg79ffP0fIRN3PHtHKBBAeEPDe aARA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdgXFqLZFd74wCkDNcLB6kMEAOb1j8V4Ap96MmSKIgpmvIkEODhOM0FKD5JSnA0zbbwL94Od8p1+qmWSA==
X-Received: by 10.55.155.151 with SMTP id d145mr22911742qke.115.1477907876786; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.85.7 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20161031053239.E9C6D12F5D@welho-filter3.welho.com>
References: <20161031053239.E9C6D12F5D@welho-filter3.welho.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:57:56 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXMdXBcJU+t_cF1n9MRApSd5wfiWjMKEqO+wwkVp43BJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.173; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f173.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.097, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1c19ME-0004sG-On 34a609c6e07f781344679996ebdaf529
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Op-sec simplification
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnXMdXBcJU+t_cF1n9MRApSd5wfiWjMKEqO+wwkVp43BJw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32749
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 31 October 2016 at 16:32, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:
> Hmm. Reading it from original and from the secured server
> gives little more verify that they really are giving same answers.

Yes, but as I observed, we're never truly certain; there's always a
pathological case where a client can be convinced of the server being
right when it is in fact wrong.  Asking both sides only adds to the
complexity of the solution.

> | GET http://www.example.com/.well-known/http-opportunistic HTTP/1.1
> | Host: www.example.com

Yes, thanks for pointing that out.  Fixed.