IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-03.txt

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 20 May 2014 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8E51A019E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 15:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sL9WOwpEOGkY for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 15:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED7AB1A02D8 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 15:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Wmss5-0003OJ-6k for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 22:50:57 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 22:50:57 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Wmss5-0003OJ-6k@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>) id 1Wmsrt-0003NI-Ro for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 22:50:45 +0000
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([134.226.56.6]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>) id 1Wmsrs-0006JY-Ji for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 22:50:45 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB97BE47; Tue, 20 May 2014 23:50:21 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p1ERiPCx5Xqt; Tue, 20 May 2014 23:50:20 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.12] (unknown [86.46.25.179]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96738BE5C; Tue, 20 May 2014 23:50:19 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <537BDC29.3040202@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 23:50:17 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <20140520034054.10225.92036.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5905C797-A8E2-417B-94AB-589C174382BA@mnot.net> <CABkgnnWNWUtAe5EfPdpLaDKRug0QuW7ngm-v7t_B3LJSf6fRCQ@mail.gmail.com> <537B12C7.2040400@cs.tcd.ie> <op.xf6j5riviw9drz@uranium.oslo.osa>
In-Reply-To: <op.xf6j5riviw9drz@uranium.oslo.osa>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: none client-ip=134.226.56.6; envelope-from=stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie; helo=mercury.scss.tcd.ie
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.125, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Wmsrs-0006JY-Ji 199467fa3ca30b7ef0950060b6a51b6c
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-03.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/537BDC29.3040202@cs.tcd.ie>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/23726
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>


On 20/05/14 23:45, Martin Nilsson wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2014 10:31:03 +0200, Stephen Farrell
> <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Would you be ok with s/opportunistic encryption/opportunistic
>> security/? The latter is the term that the saag discussion has
>> ended up landing on, (post bikeshed:-) so it'd be good if
>> that worked here too.
>>
> 
> As a random (weak) opinion point I would be against that. It would not
> be in line with what I was taught at University; That you only have
> security when you have Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability (the
> CIA rule).

Personally, I think that "only" is plain wrong and the sentence
assumes that security is a binary state and also wrong. But yes,
I do fully accept that that is the kind of thing we were all
taught and that some of us ourselves taught.

And I've very much in favour of not re-opening the bikeshedding
at all.

S.


> 
> /Martin Nilsson
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email