IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-03.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 22 May 2014 03:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A2E1A0092 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2014 20:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.253
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.253 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lwZAgWoRkmpX for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2014 20:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EE281A008E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2014 20:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1WnJBe-0003Ea-Ni for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 02:56:54 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 02:56:54 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1WnJBe-0003Ea-Ni@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1WnJBO-0003BL-Nt for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 02:56:38 +0000
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1WnJBN-0000jj-BJ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 02:56:38 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.57] (unknown [118.209.226.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B6C550A88; Wed, 21 May 2014 22:56:12 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA4WUYgTdF0P6==mPzREK8M5ba_6C48o5u0FGOYrR=2c2iq9hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 12:56:09 +1000
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0DF71B50-A1D1-422A-ADB8-C1DF58A65255@mnot.net>
References: <20140520034054.10225.92036.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5905C797-A8E2-417B-94AB-589C174382BA@mnot.net> <CABkgnnWNWUtAe5EfPdpLaDKRug0QuW7ngm-v7t_B3LJSf6fRCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYgTdF0P6==mPzREK8M5ba_6C48o5u0FGOYrR=2c2iq9hg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "\"William Chan (陈智昌)\"" <willchan@chromium.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.069, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1WnJBN-0000jj-BJ d00a7b9b3cb2c6636c3d83df7ad879c9
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-03.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/0DF71B50-A1D1-422A-ADB8-C1DF58A65255@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/23747
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 22 May 2014, at 10:25 am, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote:

> I've skimmed the draft in more detail now and have nits:
> 
> * Grammar in section 6.3. - "A browser client MUST clear persisted all alternative service information when clearing other origin-based state (i.e., cookies).”

Fixed in-repo, thanks.

> * Please consistently use "alternative services" instead of "alternate services”.

Dang, missed one.

> 
> I don't feel very strongly, but I am not sure where the times for the operational considerations are coming from. IIRC, HSTS and HPKP use much longer max-ages. Why does this draft suggest capping at 1 month?

Martin?

> 
> Cheers.
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 May 2014 20:42, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> > FYI - Martin went away and did some substantial revision of this draft, and is now an author.
> 
> The changes incorporate a draft you might have seen, but I didn't
> announce.  The main innovation here is a way to make the whole thing
> sticky in an effort to reduce the opportunity for downgrade attack.
> Pretty standard stuff, but included as a bit of a thought experiment
> as well as a bit of a test to see what people think.
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email