IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-03.txt

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 20 May 2014 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDDE1A0684 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 05:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.653
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.653 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7YDxtOXLp1kM for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 05:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 874431A0357 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 05:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1WmjMI-0001AL-Jh for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 12:41:30 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:41:30 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1WmjMI-0001AL-Jh@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1WmjM7-00019Y-M0 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 12:41:19 +0000
Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com ([74.125.82.181]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1WmjM2-0002kR-31 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 12:41:19 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w61so439558wes.40 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 05:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3uQNOzqBQGiutrmZfudOF0BCITxFG2FVfdASb+gDUfQ=; b=nnNZ8SE8iLlHNhG2CHNdT7qWs++SSde23jqPdbk83HzENHIRP1ekEc94w7xFy7giAX iY8AGXsEaNi4EpP9ImqWOjuBvbwe1UuX6ZjHeqqUJiGBx3khRIAiIjKwPIIpM8L44xMg VtrVZJvAHXNgttuKfqbg2EdFgIon+Ygf2sdM/NhYb7hPMD6Jg12wD9Dzlj4zjspO708P bCjbqlMa6fi9d41Z6RXqJ/9HIO95ilxqzWunt3oUW1w6m1XA6Tm04pSm8Zq7+sVXbjap y/wIeAHzLI2NpMjAlKj51CJSC42lD5auc8D7dNua5c8ooCvCnoxZ6WI9KXGmmiuv/TEH cm3A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.195.18.8 with SMTP id gi8mr2325866wjd.75.1400589647455; Tue, 20 May 2014 05:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.235.163 with HTTP; Tue, 20 May 2014 05:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <537B12C7.2040400@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <20140520034054.10225.92036.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5905C797-A8E2-417B-94AB-589C174382BA@mnot.net> <CABkgnnWNWUtAe5EfPdpLaDKRug0QuW7ngm-v7t_B3LJSf6fRCQ@mail.gmail.com> <537B12C7.2040400@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 05:40:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnULiNLOxxO-DMTQHfyR8gZ3VeQ2Pzzv8q7uJyDdxrjREQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.181; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-we0-f181.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.738, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1WmjM2-0002kR-31 f52a2797e3ef3bcc9f641571a5c76cc7
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-03.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnULiNLOxxO-DMTQHfyR8gZ3VeQ2Pzzv8q7uJyDdxrjREQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/23719
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 20 May 2014 01:31, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
> Would you be ok with s/opportunistic encryption/opportunistic
> security/? The latter is the term that the saag discussion has
> ended up landing on, (post bikeshed:-) so it'd be good if
> that worked here too.

Yeah, we're not looking to be revolutionary.

> I wonder if the MUST and MUST NOT terms in 5.1 are ok. But
> if they're there to find that out then that's fine:-)

The entirety of Section 5 is there to air those sorts of questions.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email