IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-03.txt

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 21 May 2014 12:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679341A05C3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2014 05:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.653
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.653 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7vXKHza5Y2Ix for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2014 05:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D1CF1A01C5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2014 05:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Wn5ov-0002N6-1Y for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 12:40:33 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:40:33 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Wn5ov-0002N6-1Y@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1Wn5oj-0002LI-Pb for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 12:40:21 +0000
Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1Wn5oi-000169-Sw for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 12:40:21 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l18so1909254wgh.26 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 21 May 2014 05:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5z6wxE467ZsX9uv5AqanI6DSTPDFt7wM1s68Hr0/X3M=; b=D7gXFyMitzmQ3mfRtZEw+FvTx3RzxwS+5+GXPEwEfmRkz9NwGHSYtZP98dYZ31/tBp rZ44On54muM53lbBE+CKB9zdlYsBTozAkGQzhWb6x/PenhAfE6zQhdw0D15kgtdLqJK4 6ctsRQUj8KKFWDjqgZD75+D8VEe4WwEqp6xINniLBClr2ahcbohlCuZi6xzpBGtHkNN0 6Ngkp5v3RGip1oiPTX/0ikVGU7Pnprj/xfzNQfbEAN9ivsOUxUKAfpq4ZAaP2CBZh4kK ak6J7PzWT8KzzxVJEzSuXrrpo9lgGtAfGmsr/o+ePqtjzSgM7d3FOfWJnAmf0DGf6hJf Ma8g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.13.162 with SMTP id i2mr10215950wic.44.1400675994325; Wed, 21 May 2014 05:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.235.163 with HTTP; Wed, 21 May 2014 05:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1A377DCF-F21B-4302-BEB5-4221E2BFA5D3@ericsson.com>
References: <20140520034054.10225.92036.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5905C797-A8E2-417B-94AB-589C174382BA@mnot.net> <1A377DCF-F21B-4302-BEB5-4221E2BFA5D3@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 05:39:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUSJ+oWH2BqBbJpth5feZqQbsK7uYhE9F-vWaFx6PY4NA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.43; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f43.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.739, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Wn5oi-000169-Sw 36af1b530c12475d8fcd949b92270406
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-03.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnUSJ+oWH2BqBbJpth5feZqQbsK7uYhE9F-vWaFx6PY4NA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/23735
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 20 May 2014 21:37, Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> wrote:
> If I understand correctly the draft
> a browser asking for http:// URI (no matter if using http/1.1 or http2) may get back an answer with an alt-svc: h2
> in that case the will start a TLS connection (with a an ALPN value of h2) towards the server exactly as per any http2;
> the only difference will be that the browser will not check the certificate
> so there won't be any difference on the wire only a different behaviour within the browser
> isn't it?

No on-the-wire difference.  Assuming that the server uses an https
port that has a valid cert.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email