IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-03.txt

"Martin Nilsson" <nilsson@opera.com> Tue, 20 May 2014 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09EA01A03F3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 15:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eSszDHrxwynG for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 15:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67D921A03DD for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 15:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1WmsnG-0001Ny-Rt for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 22:45:58 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 22:45:58 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1WmsnG-0001Ny-Rt@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nilsson@opera.com>) id 1Wmsn6-0001KK-4w for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 22:45:48 +0000
Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nilsson@opera.com>) id 1Wmsn4-00059e-Cf for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 22:45:48 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id n15so950419lbi.33 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 15:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:to:subject:references:date :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:organization:message-id :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8TANmjCI8Of8C2y7VSHtGn6YuXwP5YwpXWUKaMYUC8I=; b=RK/PgpL34qMo5Kk2c+G/rRPYLJ588/U9CPG+wQjb+ZQsIJwclXLVhqCDTSHv8GVwDP D36ui9XjaEnYqNqN/d6dQIrGVwmyxVk9y41u4W3Y6Euw+q4rHd42pXeWlqCdJ18yXjJv XBF7v+BJRja3Nng6QqeeYWItitovEL8NZksfTHj9Y7bZgETt7GLPDoRmM4PrQ7j+b/uw LfiTQ5Cr7Z2aqDBEdmu3nLfIVOyQ9HBjMHEi5Z7FNFoXLm3Kji1X/PImgS6qmtMTHq0d c0BLXgaG46OyWqtHZ17dgfxi09fSx93NE54VVMEeQ55eQ/EhqUURxzMHJww33d9OcorY 5DsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmDLVkTUB4JNaFWb0Bb4ksxq3iAppBV+QslxQzq8aHZ1RwYUM2iXlql4+QTrazA6Gz7c3qO
X-Received: by 10.112.50.2 with SMTP id y2mr4102316lbn.66.1400625918668; Tue, 20 May 2014 15:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uranium.oslo.osa ([194.181.144.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r2sm23922873laa.5.2014.05.20.15.45.17 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 May 2014 15:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <20140520034054.10225.92036.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5905C797-A8E2-417B-94AB-589C174382BA@mnot.net> <CABkgnnWNWUtAe5EfPdpLaDKRug0QuW7ngm-v7t_B3LJSf6fRCQ@mail.gmail.com> <537B12C7.2040400@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 00:45:17 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
Organization: Opera Software
Message-ID: <op.xf6j5riviw9drz@uranium.oslo.osa>
In-Reply-To: <537B12C7.2040400@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.02 (Win32)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.217.174; envelope-from=nilsson@opera.com; helo=mail-lb0-f174.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Wmsn4-00059e-Cf 14a694f33aaefb8e2e304897c7470947
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-03.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/op.xf6j5riviw9drz@uranium.oslo.osa>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/23725
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, 20 May 2014 10:31:03 +0200, Stephen Farrell  
<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:

>
> Would you be ok with s/opportunistic encryption/opportunistic
> security/? The latter is the term that the saag discussion has
> ended up landing on, (post bikeshed:-) so it'd be good if
> that worked here too.
>

As a random (weak) opinion point I would be against that. It would not be  
in line with what I was taught at University; That you only have security  
when you have Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability (the CIA rule).

/Martin Nilsson

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email