Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 11 January 2016 16:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7211A8A99 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:51:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R3LwUXvaToRf for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:51:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D639E1A870F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:51:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aIfbd-0000Oi-Jl for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:46:09 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:46:09 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aIfbd-0000Oi-Jl@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>) id 1aIfbZ-0000Mb-0b for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:46:05 +0000
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([134.226.56.6]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>) id 1aIfbU-0004BB-Hk for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:46:03 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC690BE55; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:45:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30p00mkTJReH; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:45:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FF98BE56; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:45:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1452530735; bh=+gdj3ozifh9NP6dYQ6h6fo5f+2nxQkMpyEpi+wTCKM8=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=IKYlaXM7Zqx8jSAZ8exJ262vN1nXHjioeN08L2q161psZcLbkCMuVn8UZyjbeczCo 6rQF4VNRTfwGAUdBHvyvzVawwkTWr19qEtt+W2Y2O6Voloqav3ixZVBM98FRyLCU91 ONSZBPpWJO31chFlyYa/u4tj3szVeOPC4G/klOdU=
To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <CALaySJK5fYy_JCv0Y7Fs3QpPk95fUxyt272JMc-QUpVKO7_gJA@mail.gmail.com> <56853BCC.7030005@gmx.de> <56927D52.2000106@gmx.de> <CALaySJ+mVOHinmehK2jm3jQaEkXJZ2BRbaY4a5wuw=eOOO-A9Q@mail.gmail.com> <BN3PR03MB13675838E560ED08916D245187C90@BN3PR03MB1367.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <5693DC2E.7010001@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:45:34 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR03MB13675838E560ED08916D245187C90@BN3PR03MB1367.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=134.226.56.6; envelope-from=stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie; helo=mercury.scss.tcd.ie
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.750, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1aIfbU-0004BB-Hk cf0a315df008611fa4915e872f9b7047
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5693DC2E.7010001@cs.tcd.ie>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30887
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 11/01/16 16:34, Mike Bishop wrote: > Haven't heard back from Stephen on the port-change issue we wanted > him to weigh in on; I sent him a reminder. 2nd one worked:-) Lemme go back and read the mail. Please hassle me if I've not gotten back by tomorrow sometime Cheers, S. > > -----Original Message----- From: barryleiba@gmail.com > [mailto:barryleiba@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba Sent: Sunday, > January 10, 2016 9:20 AM To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> > Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org; HTTP Working Group > <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Subject: Re: AD review of > draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 > >>>> I don't think this is a 2119 "MAY": what *else* can it do? You >>>> have no other guidance about which alternative alternative to >>>> pick, so.... I think this should just say, "it chooses the >>>> most suitable...." >>> >>> Agreed. I haven't changed that yet as it affects normative >>> language but I will unless somebody wants to defend it soonish. >> >> <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/a9df1e33703a2cb46c9b >> >> 441bfca5bbc04fff80d1> > > Nice. Is this the last of the updates, or are we still working on > any? Whenever you're ready to post a new I-D version, I'll give it a > check and request last call. > > Barry >
- AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Barry Leiba
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Barry Leiba
- ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of draft-… Julian Reschke
- Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of dr… Barry Leiba
- RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mike Bishop
- RE: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of dr… Mike Bishop
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Barry Leiba
- Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of dr… Julian Reschke
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mark Nottingham
- Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of dr… Martin Thomson
- Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of dr… Mark Nottingham
- Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of dr… Julian Reschke
- Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of dr… Julian Reschke
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Barry Leiba
- Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of dr… Mark Nottingham
- Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of dr… Julian Reschke
- Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of dr… Julian Reschke
- RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mike Bishop
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Stephen Farrell
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Stephen Farrell
- RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mike Bishop
- RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mike Bishop
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Barry Leiba
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Stephen Farrell
- RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mike Bishop
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Stephen Farrell
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mark Nottingham
- Re: (Possibly duplicate mail) Suggesting /.well-k… Barry Leiba
- RE: (Possibly duplicate mail) Suggesting /.well-k… Mike Bishop
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Chris Bentzel
- RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mike Bishop
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Chris Bentzel
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Martin Thomson
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Patrick McManus
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Chris Bentzel
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Barry Leiba
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mark Nottingham
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mark Nottingham