IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Errata Rejected] RFC7234 (4334)

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 13 April 2015 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4581B29DE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id trPG87qfgRX9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE2BC1B29DD for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Yho97-0002Fa-G6 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:52:05 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:52:05 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Yho97-0002Fa-G6@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Yho91-0002EI-Vh for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:52:00 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Yho90-0006kD-O1 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:51:59 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.16] (unknown [120.149.147.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22EA522E200; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:51:27 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150413034357.4AABA180092@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:51:25 +1000
Cc: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, HTTP <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <61AEEB7C-6554-47BA-82DC-22E94820F6C5@mnot.net>
References: <20150413034357.4AABA180092@rfc-editor.org>
To: antonio.ignacio.vera@gmail.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.435, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Yho90-0006kD-O1 76a2423e1cb12c55a0fd36710f60371b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Errata Rejected] RFC7234 (4334)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/61AEEB7C-6554-47BA-82DC-22E94820F6C5@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29329
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Antonio,

Thanks for noticing that. I suspect that Julian will correct it in our online source at:
  https://github.com/httpwg/http11bis
.. and it'll filter through to the places where we can get it in time.

If you like, you can raise an issue here:
  https://github.com/httpwg/http11bis/issues

Cheers,



> On 13 Apr 2015, at 1:43 pm, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7234,
> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7234&eid=4334
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Status: Rejected
> Type: Editorial
> 
> Reported by: Antonio Vera <antonio.ignacio.vera@gmail.com>
> Date Reported: 2015-04-12
> Rejected by: Barry Leiba (IESG)
> 
> Section: 5.3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> The Expires value is an HTTP-date timestamp, as defined in Section
>   7.1.1.1 of [RFC7231].
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The Expires value is an HTTP-date timestamp, as defined in Section
>   7.1.1.1 of [RFC7231].
> 
> Notes
> -----
> There's no error in the text itself, but the address of the link in 7.1.1.1 is pointing to a hashtag in RFC 7234, not RFC 7231 as it should.
> 
> Currently, 7.1.1.1 points to: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234#section-7.1.1.1
> It should point to: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.1.1
> --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
> The RFC Editor has nothing to do with the HTML versions on tools.ietf.org, which are unofficial versions, with the HTML conversion on a best-effort basis.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7234 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-26)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching
> Publication Date    : June 2014
> Author(s)           : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email