[Errata Rejected] RFC7234 (4334)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 13 April 2015 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968491A9104 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 20:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0uCH9QxZFI1z for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 20:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A6201A9103 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 20:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YhVJ0-0005tM-4f for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 03:45:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 03:45:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YhVJ0-0005tM-4f@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1YhVIt-0005ev-I8 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 03:44:55 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1YhVIr-0002yL-QP for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 03:44:55 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4AABA180092; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 20:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: antonio.ignacio.vera@gmail.com, fielding@gbiv.com, mnot@mnot.net, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20150413034357.4AABA180092@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 20:43:57 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.49; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; helo=rfc-editor.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.665, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1YhVIr-0002yL-QP 5b9d4ad5b4c195a1aa30464395eea0f8
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Errata Rejected] RFC7234 (4334)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20150413034357.4AABA180092@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29321
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7234,
"Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7234&eid=4334

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Antonio Vera <antonio.ignacio.vera@gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2015-04-12
Rejected by: Barry Leiba (IESG)

Section: 5.3

Original Text
-------------
The Expires value is an HTTP-date timestamp, as defined in Section
   7.1.1.1 of [RFC7231].

Corrected Text
--------------
The Expires value is an HTTP-date timestamp, as defined in Section
   7.1.1.1 of [RFC7231].

Notes
-----
There's no error in the text itself, but the address of the link in 7.1.1.1 is pointing to a hashtag in RFC 7234, not RFC 7231 as it should.

Currently, 7.1.1.1 points to: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234#section-7.1.1.1
It should point to: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.1.1
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
The RFC Editor has nothing to do with the HTML versions on tools.ietf.org, which are unofficial versions, with the HTML conversion on a best-effort basis.

--------------------------------------
RFC7234 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-26)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching
Publication Date    : June 2014
Author(s)           : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG