[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4334)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 13 April 2015 02:47 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4246C1A8A39 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 19:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.013
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3SbXKnmWOHpi for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 19:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2FC91A8A29 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 19:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YhUL6-0004Bk-GY for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 02:43:08 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 02:43:08 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YhUL6-0004Bk-GY@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1YhUKr-00049a-3j for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 02:42:53 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1YhUKj-000094-RR for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 02:42:48 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5522D180092; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 19:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: fielding@gbiv.com, mnot@mnot.net, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, barryleiba@computer.org, mnot@mnot.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: antonio.ignacio.vera@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20150413024147.5522D180092@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 19:41:47 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.49; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; helo=rfc-editor.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.798, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1YhUKj-000094-RR 7c0a96d902eef523f116e28e28518809
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4334)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20150413024147.5522D180092@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29320
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7234, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7234&eid=4334 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Antonio Vera <antonio.ignacio.vera@gmail.com> Section: 5.3 Original Text ------------- The Expires value is an HTTP-date timestamp, as defined in Section 7.1.1.1 of [RFC7231]. Corrected Text -------------- The Expires value is an HTTP-date timestamp, as defined in Section 7.1.1.1 of [RFC7231]. Notes ----- There's no error in the text itself, but the address of the link in 7.1.1.1 is pointing to a hashtag in RFC 7234, not RFC 7231 as it should. Currently, 7.1.1.1 points to: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234#section-7.1.1.1 It should point to: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.1.1 Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7234 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-26) -------------------------------------- Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching Publication Date : June 2014 Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4334) RFC Errata System
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7234 (4334) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Errata Rejected] RFC7234 (4334) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Errata Rejected] RFC7234 (4334) Tony Hansen
- Re: [Errata Rejected] RFC7234 (4334) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Errata Rejected] RFC7234 (4334) Julian Reschke