Re: [Errata Rejected] RFC7234 (4334)

[Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>]

Aha. Thanks, Tony.

Cheers,


> On 14 Apr 2015, at 10:18 am, Tony Hansen <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> I have a feeling that this is not a problem with the document, but instead with the tooling.
> 
> That is, the missing piece of information is which HTML-ized version of the document was Antonio Vera looking at?
> 
> If he was looking at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234, then yup, it's pointing at the wrong document. The htmlizer tool on tools.ietf.org picked up the "Section ..." text and made that into a link to the section within the current document.
> 
> However, if he was looking at the files in github, he would have seen a link to the proper document.
> 
> 
> So I think there is nothing that needs to be done here by anyone in the http group. But it might be worth poking Henrik to take a look at the rfcmarkup tool to see if an improvement can be made.
> 
> OR, anyone else can take a look at the rfcmarkup code and see if they can come up with a code fix. I'm sure Henrik would love to buy it back.
> 
>    Tony Hansen
> 
> On 4/13/15 7:51 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Antonio,
>> 
>> Thanks for noticing that. I suspect that Julian will correct it in our online source at:
>>   https://github.com/httpwg/http11bis
>> .. and it'll filter through to the places where we can get it in time.
>> 
>> If you like, you can raise an issue here:
>>   https://github.com/httpwg/http11bis/issues
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 13 Apr 2015, at 1:43 pm, RFC Errata System <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7234,
>>> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching".
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7234&eid=4334
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Status: Rejected
>>> Type: Editorial
>>> 
>>> Reported by: Antonio Vera <[e-mail]>
>>> Date Reported: 2015-04-12
>>> Rejected by: Barry Leiba (IESG)
>>> 
>>> Section: 5.3
>>> 
>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>> The Expires value is an HTTP-date timestamp, as defined in Section
>>>   7.1.1.1 of [RFC7231].
>>> 
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>> The Expires value is an HTTP-date timestamp, as defined in Section
>>>   7.1.1.1 of [RFC7231].
>>> 
>>> Notes
>>> -----
>>> There's no error in the text itself, but the address of the link in 7.1.1.1 is pointing to a hashtag in RFC 7234, not RFC 7231 as it should.
>>> 
>>> Currently, 7.1.1.1 points to: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234#section-7.1.1.1
>>> It should point to: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.1.1
>>> --VERIFIER NOTES--
>>> The RFC Editor has nothing to do with the HTML versions on tools.ietf.org, which are unofficial versions, with the HTML conversion on a best-effort basis.
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> RFC7234 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-26)
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Title               : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching
>>> Publication Date    : June 2014
>>> Author(s)           : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed.
>>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>> Source              : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis
>>> Area                : Applications
>>> Stream              : IETF
>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>> 
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>> 
>> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/