IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: draft-song-dns-wireformat-http

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 03 August 2016 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9821F12D5E8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.308
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.308 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FVu0_qQmQYB8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCE3012D0C4 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bUlzx-0003Ae-TJ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:33:33 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:33:33 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bUlzx-0003Ae-TJ@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1bUlzs-00039x-F6 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:33:28 +0000
Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1bUlzp-0006fj-Q8 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:33:27 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id q128so62249402wma.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 19:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cM/guGL1MbtLaNj+8AbeEuImB1pdlzvtlIW7hPGBV2Q=; b=w9g3N/wEJeFqvk+1WoztztiVk4xnQNdVdyXRZq6sdDOSnCgfJKRMTXDPuSOmpuFleH JLXUbMCrbKVqA7AmjNH/rL/4+N1umwgfVNK3jNC9yPdGq5TJPh8m2xny8nLMiNQkCR66 m+llVEmkFkAjsdDPAlLj7gLDtvjgAu++zLwIegIDKeF7lmOBjOhUrBg1OOdTEjART1fm oiSb/FnpKw80CyikEndJPCAtUR9NWQ10sBzzH9x4ANLGXkt0o/SnbQNnGu9OR0Mfroan Rjj9xtMSU3PAKd8OswcrSbi1sE9ZqZyg5cpBIlrHdgwCWCxGDJmxpJKCgsH83e3+xGnT dzRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cM/guGL1MbtLaNj+8AbeEuImB1pdlzvtlIW7hPGBV2Q=; b=A+B/NBu+7c1uN6AxnaOHvKQbgr+AdcK7/LE9uUm/h+41ZZq1Fph/9nv1ifqgLSyWz5 f8R5nv0SAe10e5RKQAKLmMQPChD8k+z7/z2wq+xY02sHU1pdmzcnkwsENXmJNhh1CNzu VzUNWliOHVU3+DHiaJaRK471n3GfDpUTQJD7ocb8RXtF+vFogynv1FRu7LpJ6RacA5M4 bYEMynH7wOwZu9LALx6Esr/jlQNPdeg+FpsNqG31Nz4RWrsYfAe4VN2+23zyWKwRTvEF NgIx5JHr3d30qHKpMLJEroT+IYULy3E98aeuv3YOiXwtKhfM+0q8DTAfrsAD0aEMa8pB f1QA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutO9AyvtIhRXbo89/ikzfjexfVSWYWXHPXxUizzfbk0zooqVeUsket9Q4XH70HL0cOGzhUTZdtFcSux1Q==
X-Received: by 10.194.175.38 with SMTP id bx6mr64319671wjc.47.1470190277228; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 19:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.167.150 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+G+R6nCnz9EvDQgBGqtKmmM1zU2T8J_HQdTzD2zzGwjtg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e5c97630-a11f-0c93-8f4b-482764c85f71@gmail.com> <CADyWQ+FntHwanR551XtUtMQ4iw4m9RA4_0SK5zg6qvSHDs5EEw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUSQEnqFKpZPPMOyhkeQzuwdpOspiKUpbWPYCwnfQ4hCA@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+G+R6nCnz9EvDQgBGqtKmmM1zU2T8J_HQdTzD2zzGwjtg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 12:11:16 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWxJ-iWAnCvJTJSh7MpYYna0+0ipOsv3n82LSFJuM9S8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm0-f53.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.704, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1bUlzp-0006fj-Q8 f42eaaf98b971965f81efec923b5bda0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: draft-song-dns-wireformat-http
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWxJ-iWAnCvJTJSh7MpYYna0+0ipOsv3n82LSFJuM9S8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32160
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 3 August 2016 at 10:47, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> There was another draft which discussed various methods of DNS over HTTP
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shane-review-dns-over-http/
>
> We didn't choose to put it up for adoption, but it may be worthy to merge
> some of that into this document.

The questions that that document asks are the right ones, namely: what
is the purpose of the protocol?  Avoiding network errors is - at least
in my view - a poor reason to move to HTTPS.  How HTTP is used is one
issue that needs to be considered when choosing an approach;
draft-song doesn't really do that very well.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email