IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Early Hints (103)

Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> Wed, 30 November 2016 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2624812999F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:45:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OAAIK00QO5zq for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:45:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497031299A2 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:45:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cCAlI-0004qJ-SQ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:41:48 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:41:48 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cCAlI-0004qJ-SQ@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1cCAlB-0004pV-4j for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:41:41 +0000
Received: from mail-sn1nam01on0100.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.32.100] helo=NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1cCAl3-0006ff-PY for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:41:35 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=fI16suw3Fnu79ozw0G9NpjcZQ6waNLjVXyMXMpZRvHE=; b=A3ydC0a7+qV1vfcBQ502XYoayUFJZNhxeQ0891THh3oWswjI5xCxY4VdaP4pbqhtX6j+Ox+aw6SyDZcHrTn8UFpaPZE6uvh9bN49KiJL+2CtBA86jcT3mHh2ThzZEHGNG8tleNHe1PkRNqa74ydKbwtkEjuyBDJcV8zHVG3CvtY=
Received: from BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.173.144.15) by BN6PR03MB2707.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.173.144.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.747.13; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:41:05 +0000
Received: from BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.144.15]) by BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.144.15]) with mapi id 15.01.0747.018; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:41:05 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: Early Hints (103)
Thread-Index: AQHSRRBRC1Ijs0KrwUuVIuSerQ2WlKDx+PDw
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:41:05 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR03MB27085A94015460A4E0349EFB878C0@BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAOdDvNos+qXxi8K3HPtkuzkAuc1ctAmdt=Oz+vJy+oBgB7skQA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNos+qXxi8K3HPtkuzkAuc1ctAmdt=Oz+vJy+oBgB7skQA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:c::14c]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ebcde4b2-bb57-40a0-af01-08d41958d33d
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:BN6PR03MB2707;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR03MB2707; 7:KrikCNoss1Vrwzmi2Vc74MfRGoK7G369S0RBklyKz08T1aM5n32bSXuIvHotytXRiOzCrDar7lN6J9ATyHtPOtaY9rNxAQq9kunhwPlqljEXLMz+I6Etlv4NVP/OnbPktMwhsDl4yNhOhFits+0qMeTvfuLI4lvXwzDxkA4S7/nth1SYD4pHhIHKtU3SQPuF9WXk2bzCvjDsJ2m/kBp0ztAEw8kOGpik7zsEtkEslDXYRKD3piYQNtAmVw08lyL4wOLbeqpGKjVGW5oJUxSwHmtyHrjPhouLh4hyKJXG2/gQkYA3wXscXPRMFZ9s2esZVTaF3CzchuwcEek0GmyleUbbV5Jc3DuxicB144rswVme1LDZlEHbK4Cb0zW3jObC+fXVwJyHR+s7arsx85YX0MQ1jlvjxuc9knA6VRo9sWV7535k7+v00qox6WEmqazkwpq41sxCgRjgecLDoEBrqFWTM5jhqrdtxhj9I8KzvYA=
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR03MB27079A20E0945915597EE785878C0@BN6PR03MB2707.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6047074)(6072148); SRVR:BN6PR03MB2707; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN6PR03MB2707;
x-forefront-prvs: 0142F22657
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7916002)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(790700001)(39450400002)(39410400001)(2900100001)(33656002)(68736007)(3660700001)(9686002)(5001770100001)(7906003)(97736004)(107886002)(77096006)(6116002)(2906002)(2950100002)(102836003)(606004)(19609705001)(6506003)(229853002)(92566002)(76576001)(86612001)(8990500004)(5660300001)(38730400001)(7696004)(10290500002)(7116003)(189998001)(122556002)(86362001)(101416001)(76176999)(54356999)(5005710100001)(106356001)(106116001)(50986999)(99286002)(8936002)(105586002)(74316002)(8676002)(10090500001)(3280700002)(7736002)(7846002)(81156014)(81166006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR03MB2707; H:BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN6PR03MB27085A94015460A4E0349EFB878C0BN6PR03MB2708namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Nov 2016 19:41:05.7223 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR03MB2707
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=104.47.32.100; envelope-from=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com; helo=NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.361, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_NW=0.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cCAl3-0006ff-PY 0de593c49ef72e5126fd232bc7398a06
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Early Hints (103)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/BN6PR03MB27085A94015460A4E0349EFB878C0@BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33053
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Strongly support.  It’s useful and exactly what this class of responses was intended for.  Let’s do it – and fix the bugs we flush out at the same time.

From: Patrick McManus [mailto:mcmanus@ducksong.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 2:27 PM
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Early Hints (103)

Dear Gentlefolk of HTTPbis,
This is a followup to Kazuho's presentation in Seoul[*] where he discussed https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code/
The idea seemed to have acceptance (both in the room and on the list) with some concerns expressed about interoperability. Kazuho was kind enough to publish an endpoint so you can test if the client you implement has an unexpected failure in the face of 103.
However, the draft was published pretty close to meeting time and there wasn't much space for discussion in the room. So before we do a Call For Adoption, I would like to hear some more discussion so the chairs can be confident there is interest - even if that discussion is "I would like to implement that" or "what does that accomplish?". Please do chime in, your silence will be taken for disinterest otherwise :).

-Patrick
[*] http://recs.conf.meetecho.com/Playout/watch.jsp?recording=IETF97_HTTPBIS&chapter=chapter_1 goto 1:43 mark

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email